Zhang Yi-Xia, Wang Xue-Mei, Kang Shu, Li Xiang, Geng Jing
Department of Ultrasonography, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
J Cancer Res Ther. 2015 Oct-Dec;11(4):697-703. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.146129.
AIM: This meta-analysis aims to determine the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the qualitative diagnosis of metastatic sentinel lymph node (SLN) for patients with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We screened PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CISCOM, CINAHL, Google Scholar, CBM, and CNKI databases. All analyses were calculated using the STATA software, version 12.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA). We calculated the summary statistics for sensitivity (Sen), specificity (Spe), positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR + /LR-), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve. Thirteen articles that met all inclusion criteria were included in this meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 876 breast cancer patients were assessed, including 372 patients with metastatic SLN and 504 patients without metastatic SLN. All SLN were histologically confirmed after conducting CEUS. The pooled Sen was 0.80 (95%CI = 0.76-0.84); the pooled Spe was 0.94 (95% CI = 0.91-0.96). The pooled LR + was 6.28 (95%CI = 3.61-10.92); the pooled negative LR - was 0.218 (95% CI = 0.10-0.31). The pooled DOR of CEUS in qualitative diagnosis of SLN metastasis was 49.10 (95% CI = 27.89-86.45). The area under the SROC curve was 0.937 (standard error [SE] =0.0128). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis suggests that CEUS may have high a diagnostic accuracy in testing for metastatic SLN in breast cancer. Thus, CEUS may be a good tool for differential diagnosis between metastatic and non-metastatic SLN.
目的:本荟萃分析旨在确定超声造影(CEUS)在乳腺癌患者转移性前哨淋巴结(SLN)定性诊断中的准确性。 材料与方法:我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆、CISCOM、CINAHL、谷歌学术、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)和中国知网数据库。所有分析均使用STATA软件12.0版(美国德克萨斯州大学站市Stata公司)进行计算。我们计算了敏感性(Sen)、特异性(Spe)、阳性和阴性似然比(LR + /LR-)、诊断比值比(DOR)和受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线的汇总统计量。本荟萃分析纳入了13篇符合所有纳入标准的文章。 结果:共评估了876例乳腺癌患者,其中372例为转移性SLN患者,504例为非转移性SLN患者。所有SLN在进行CEUS后均经组织学证实。汇总敏感性为0.80(95%CI = 0.76 - 0.84);汇总特异性为0.94(95%CI = 0.91 - 0.96)。汇总阳性似然比为6.28(95%CI = 3.61 - 10.92);汇总阴性似然比为0.218(95%CI = 0.10 - 0.31)。CEUS在SLN转移定性诊断中的汇总诊断比值比为49.10(95%CI = 27.89 - 86.45)。SROC曲线下面积为0.937(标准误[SE] = 0.0128)。 结论:我们的荟萃分析表明,CEUS在检测乳腺癌转移性SLN方面可能具有较高的诊断准确性。因此,CEUS可能是鉴别转移性和非转移性SLN的良好工具。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020-5-29
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023-11
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015-8-15
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023-11
Onco Targets Ther. 2017-2-22