Institute for Milk Hygiene, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Institute for Milk Hygiene, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2016 Apr 16;223:33-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
Sanitation protocols are applied on a daily basis in food processing facilities to prevent the risk of cross-contamination with spoilage organisms. Floor drain water serves along with product-associated samples (slicer dust, brine or cheese smear) as an important hygiene indicator in monitoring Listeria monocytogenes in food processing facilities. Microbial communities of floor drains are representative for each processing area and are influenced to a large degree by food residues, liquid effluents and washing water. The microbial communities of drain water are steadily changing, whereas drain biofilms provide more stable niches. Bacterial communities of four floor drains were characterized using 16S rRNA gene pyrosequencing to better understand the composition and exchange of drain water and drain biofilm communities. Furthermore, the L. monocytogenes contamination status of each floor drain was determined by applying cultivation-independent real-time PCR quantification and cultivation-dependent detection according to ISO11290-1. Pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes of drain water and drain biofilm bacterial communities yielded 50,611 reads, which were clustered into 641 operational taxonomic units (OTUs), affiliated to 16 phyla dominated by Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. The most abundant OTUs represented either product- (Lactococcus lactis) or fermentation- and food spoilage-associated phylotypes (Pseudomonas mucidolens, Pseudomonas fragi, Leuconostoc citreum, and Acetobacter tropicalis). The microbial communities in DW and DB samples were distinct in each sample type and throughout the whole processing plant, indicating the presence of indigenous specific microbial communities in each processing compartment. The microbiota of drain biofilms was largely different from the microbiota of the drain water. A sampling approach based on drain water alone may thus only provide reliable information on planktonic bacterial cells but might not allow conclusions on the bacterial composition of the microbiota in biofilms.
在食品加工设施中,每天都应用卫生规程以防止腐败生物体的交叉污染风险。地漏水以及与产品相关的样品(切片器灰尘、盐水或奶酪涂片)一起作为监测食品加工设施中单核细胞增生李斯特菌的重要卫生指标。地漏的微生物群落代表每个加工区域,并且在很大程度上受到食物残渣、液体流出物和洗涤水的影响。地漏水的微生物群落不断变化,而地漏生物膜提供了更稳定的小生境。使用 16S rRNA 基因焦磷酸测序对四个地漏的细菌群落进行了表征,以更好地了解地漏水和地漏生物膜群落的组成和交换。此外,通过应用非培养实时 PCR 定量和根据 ISO11290-1 进行的培养依赖性检测来确定每个地漏的单核细胞增生李斯特菌污染状况。地漏水和地漏生物膜细菌群落的 16S rRNA 基因焦磷酸测序产生了 50,611 个读数,这些读数聚类为 641 个操作分类单元(OTU),隶属于以变形菌门、厚壁菌门和拟杆菌门为主的 16 个门。最丰富的 OTU 代表产品(乳球菌乳球菌)或发酵和食品腐败相关的生物型(粘质沙雷氏菌、脆弱拟杆菌、柠檬明串珠菌和热带醋杆菌)。DW 和 DB 样品中的微生物群落在每种样品类型和整个加工厂中都有明显的区别,这表明每个加工隔室中都存在土著特定的微生物群落。生物膜中的微生物群落与地漏水的微生物群落有很大的不同。因此,仅基于地漏水的采样方法可能仅提供关于浮游细菌细胞的可靠信息,但可能无法得出关于生物膜中微生物群落细菌组成的结论。