Didion John P, Morgan Andrew P, Yadgary Liran, Bell Timothy A, McMullan Rachel C, Ortiz de Solorzano Lydia, Britton-Davidian Janice, Bult Carol J, Campbell Karl J, Castiglia Riccardo, Ching Yung-Hao, Chunco Amanda J, Crowley James J, Chesler Elissa J, Förster Daniel W, French John E, Gabriel Sofia I, Gatti Daniel M, Garland Theodore, Giagia-Athanasopoulou Eva B, Giménez Mabel D, Grize Sofia A, Gündüz İslam, Holmes Andrew, Hauffe Heidi C, Herman Jeremy S, Holt James M, Hua Kunjie, Jolley Wesley J, Lindholm Anna K, López-Fuster María J, Mitsainas George, da Luz Mathias Maria, McMillan Leonard, Ramalhinho Maria da Graça Morgado, Rehermann Barbara, Rosshart Stephan P, Searle Jeremy B, Shiao Meng-Shin, Solano Emanuela, Svenson Karen L, Thomas-Laemont Patricia, Threadgill David W, Ventura Jacint, Weinstock George M, Pomp Daniel, Churchill Gary A, Pardo-Manuel de Villena Fernando
Department of Genetics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Center for Genome Science, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Department of Genetics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Carolina Center for Genome Science, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Jun;33(6):1381-95. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw036. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
A selective sweep is the result of strong positive selection driving newly occurring or standing genetic variants to fixation, and can dramatically alter the pattern and distribution of allelic diversity in a population. Population-level sequencing data have enabled discoveries of selective sweeps associated with genes involved in recent adaptations in many species. In contrast, much debate but little evidence addresses whether "selfish" genes are capable of fixation-thereby leaving signatures identical to classical selective sweeps-despite being neutral or deleterious to organismal fitness. We previously described R2d2, a large copy-number variant that causes nonrandom segregation of mouse Chromosome 2 in females due to meiotic drive. Here we show population-genetic data consistent with a selfish sweep driven by alleles of R2d2 with high copy number (R2d2(HC)) in natural populations. We replicate this finding in multiple closed breeding populations from six outbred backgrounds segregating for R2d2 alleles. We find that R2d2(HC) rapidly increases in frequency, and in most cases becomes fixed in significantly fewer generations than can be explained by genetic drift. R2d2(HC) is also associated with significantly reduced litter sizes in heterozygous mothers, making it a true selfish allele. Our data provide direct evidence of populations actively undergoing selfish sweeps, and demonstrate that meiotic drive can rapidly alter the genomic landscape in favor of mutations with neutral or even negative effects on overall Darwinian fitness. Further study will reveal the incidence of selfish sweeps, and will elucidate the relative contributions of selfish genes, adaptation and genetic drift to evolution.
选择性清除是强正选择作用的结果,它促使新出现的或已存在的遗传变异固定下来,并能显著改变种群中等位基因多样性的模式和分布。种群水平的测序数据已使人们发现了许多物种中与近期适应性相关基因的选择性清除现象。相比之下,关于“自私”基因是否能够固定下来(从而留下与经典选择性清除相同的特征),尽管对生物体适应性是中性或有害的,但存在很多争论且证据不足。我们之前描述了R2d2,这是一个大的拷贝数变异,由于减数分裂驱动,它会导致雌性小鼠2号染色体的非随机分离。在这里,我们展示了与自然种群中高拷贝数的R2d2等位基因(R2d2(HC))驱动的自私性清除相一致的群体遗传学数据。我们在六个分离R2d2等位基因的远交背景的多个封闭繁殖群体中重复了这一发现。我们发现R2d2(HC)的频率迅速增加,并且在大多数情况下,其固定所需的世代数明显少于遗传漂变所能解释的世代数。R2d2(HC)还与杂合子母亲的产仔数显著减少有关,使其成为一个真正的自私等位基因。我们的数据提供了种群正在积极经历自私性清除的直接证据,并证明减数分裂驱动可以迅速改变基因组格局,有利于对整体达尔文适应性具有中性甚至负面影响的突变。进一步的研究将揭示自私性清除的发生率,并阐明自私基因、适应性和遗传漂变对进化的相对贡献。