Shetty Sandeep, Hunt Katie, Douthwaite Amy, Athanasiou Maria, Hickey Ann, Greenough Anne
Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, MRC and Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, King's College London, London, UK Neonatal Intensive Care Centre, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Neonatal Intensive Care Centre, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Sep;101(5):F408-11. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309683. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
To determine whether the time to achieve full oral feeding differed between infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) supported by nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) compared with those supported by nCPAP and subsequently transferred to heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HHFNC).
Two-cohort comparison.
Tertiary neonatal unit.
-72 infants, median gestational age 27 (range 24-32) weeks in the nCPAP group, and 44 infants, median gestational age 27 (range 24-31) weeks in the nCPAP/HHFNC group.
Between 2011 and 2013, infants post extubation were supported by nCPAP and from 2013 infants were supported by nCPAP and then HHFNC.
The postnatal age at which oral feeds were first trialled and full oral feeds established. The length of respiratory support as either nCPAP or nCPAP/HHFNC and the total length of respiratory support and hospital stay were also determined. Subanalysis was undertaken of infants requiring respiratory support beyond 34 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA).
The postnatal age at trial of first oral feeds was earlier in the nCPAP/HHFNC group (p=0.012), but infants were a shorter time on nCPAP compared with nCPAP/HHFNC (p=0.003). On subgroup analysis, the age to achieve full oral feeds was earlier in the nCPAP/HHFNC group (p<0.001).
In infants with BPD who required respiratory support beyond 34 weeks PMA, use of nCPAP then HHFNC was associated with earlier establishment of full oral feeds. Consideration should be given to assessing stable BPD infants with regard to oral feeding while on CPAP.
确定接受经鼻持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)支持的支气管肺发育不良(BPD)婴儿与接受nCPAP支持随后转为加热、湿化高流量鼻导管吸氧(HHFNC)的婴儿相比,实现完全经口喂养的时间是否存在差异。
两组队列比较。
三级新生儿病房。
nCPAP组72例婴儿,中位胎龄27(范围24 - 32)周;nCPAP/HHFNC组44例婴儿,中位胎龄27(范围24 - 31)周。
2011年至2013年,拔管后的婴儿接受nCPAP支持,2013年起婴儿先接受nCPAP支持,然后接受HHFNC支持。
首次尝试经口喂养及建立完全经口喂养时的出生后年龄。还确定了作为nCPAP或nCPAP/HHFNC的呼吸支持时长、呼吸支持总时长及住院时长。对出生后年龄超过34周仍需要呼吸支持的婴儿进行了亚组分析。
nCPAP/HHFNC组首次尝试经口喂养的出生后年龄更早(p = 0.012),但与nCPAP/HHFNC组相比,nCPAP组婴儿接受nCPAP的时间更短(p = 0.003)。亚组分析显示,nCPAP/HHFNC组实现完全经口喂养的年龄更早(p < 0.001)。
在出生后年龄超过34周仍需要呼吸支持的BPD婴儿中,先使用nCPAP然后使用HHFNC与更早建立完全经口喂养有关。对于接受CPAP治疗的稳定BPD婴儿,应考虑评估其经口喂养情况。