Dludla Andile, Forman Tarryn B, Lloyd Mikaela K, Moodley Savannah O, Pillay Sarveshvari B, Krüger Esedra
Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Health SA. 2025 Feb 14;30:2809. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2809. eCollection 2025.
Introduction of oral feeding for young children receiving high-flow oxygen has recently gained interest. With limited literature, there are varied opinions regarding the safety of oral feeding in this population.
This study describes speech-language therapists' (SLTs) views on oral feeding for infants receiving high-flow oxygen.
A South African online survey study.
A descriptive quantitative survey was distributed electronically via social networking sites. Purposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit expert SLTs. Twenty-one South African SLTs working with paediatric swallowing and feeding, from nine provinces responded. Data were analysed descriptively.
Of 21 responses, only nine were fully complete, indicative of how few South African SLTs work with infants on high-flow oxygen. Current oral feeding practices varied with differences between nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC). Strategies for oral feeding included volume and time limitations, monitoring physiological stability and assessing for aspiration. Thin liquids were most commonly used. Varied opinions, with no protocols or guidelines for introduction of oral feeding of young children on high-flow oxygen, are reported.
SLTs' practices regarding oral feeding in infants/children receiving high-flow oxygen are variable. Professionals share common approaches to determine feeding readiness and monitor tolerance. Without guidelines and standardised protocols, SLTs are left to make decisions based only on experience. A need exists for further research.
There is variability in initiation of oral feeds, highlighting the need for further data to inform uniform protocol and guideline development to enhance SLTs' decision-making.
近期,对于接受高流量吸氧的幼儿开始经口喂养引发了关注。鉴于相关文献有限,对于该群体经口喂养的安全性存在不同观点。
本研究描述了言语治疗师对接受高流量吸氧婴儿经口喂养的看法。
一项南非在线调查研究。
通过社交网站以电子方式分发描述性定量调查问卷。采用目的抽样和滚雪球抽样方法招募专家言语治疗师。来自九个省份的21名从事儿科吞咽和喂养工作的南非言语治疗师做出了回应。对数据进行描述性分析。
在21份回复中,只有9份完整,这表明在南非,很少有言语治疗师为接受高流量吸氧的婴儿提供服务。目前的经口喂养做法各不相同,鼻持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)和高流量鼻导管(HFNC)之间存在差异。经口喂养策略包括限制量和时间、监测生理稳定性以及评估是否有误吸。最常使用稀液体。据报告,对于接受高流量吸氧的幼儿开始经口喂养,存在不同观点,且没有相关方案或指南。
言语治疗师对接受高流量吸氧的婴儿/儿童进行经口喂养的做法各不相同。专业人员在确定喂养准备情况和监测耐受性方面有共同的方法。由于没有指南和标准化方案,言语治疗师只能根据经验做出决策。有必要进行进一步研究。
经口喂养的起始存在差异,这凸显了需要更多数据来为统一方案和指南的制定提供依据,以加强言语治疗师的决策制定。