Suppr超能文献

与对中心血容量逐渐减少的高耐受性相关的机制整合的变异性:代偿储备。

Variability in integration of mechanisms associated with high tolerance to progressive reductions in central blood volume: the compensatory reserve.

作者信息

Carter Robert, Hinojosa-Laborde Carmen, Convertino Victor A

机构信息

US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas

US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Physiol Rep. 2016 Feb;4(4). doi: 10.14814/phy2.12705.

Abstract

High tolerance to progressive reductions in central blood volume has been associated with higher heart rate (HR), peripheral vascular resistance (PVR), sympathetic nerve activity (SNA), and vagally mediated cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). Using a database of 116 subjects classified as high tolerance to presyncopal-limited lower body negative pressure (LBNP), we tested the hypothesis that subjects with greater cardiac baroreflex withdrawal (i.e., BRS > 1.0) would demonstrate greater LBNP tolerance associated with higher HR, PVR, and SNA. Subjects underwent LBNP to presyncope. Mean and diastolic arterial pressure (MAP; DAP) was measured by finger photoplethysmography and BRS (down sequence) was autocalculated (WinCPRS) as ∆R-R Interval/∆DAP. DownBRS : ms/mmHg) was used to dichotomize subjects into two groups (Group 1 = DownBRS > 1.0, N = 49, and Group 2 = DownBRS < 1.0, N = 67) at the time of presyncope. Muscle SNA was measured directly from the peroneal nerve via microneurography (N = 19) in subjects from Groups 1 (n = 9) and 2 (n = 10). Group 1 (DownBRS > 1.0) had lower HR (107 ± 19 vs. 131 ± 20 bpm), higher stroke volume (45 ± 15 vs. 36 ± 15 mL), less SNA (45 ± 13 vs. 53 ± 7 bursts/min), and less increase in PVR (4.1 ± 1.3 vs. 4.5 ± 2.6) compared to Group 2 (DownBRS < 1.0). Both groups had similar tolerance times (1849 ± 260 vs. 1839 ± 253 sec), MAP (78 ± 11 vs. 79 ± 12 mmHg), compensatory reserve index (CRI) (0.10 ± 0.03 vs. 0.09 ± 0.01), and cardiac output (4.5 ± 1.2 vs. 4.7 ± 1.1 L/min) at presyncope. Contrary to our hypothesis, higher HR, PVR, SNA, and BRS were not associated with greater tolerance to reduced central blood volume. These data are the first to demonstrate the variability and uniqueness of individual human physiological strategies designed to compensate for progressive reductions in central blood volume. The sum total of these integrated strategies is accurately reflected by the measurement of the compensatory reserve.

摘要

对中心血容量逐渐减少的高耐受性与较高的心率(HR)、外周血管阻力(PVR)、交感神经活动(SNA)以及迷走神经介导的心脏压力反射敏感性(BRS)有关。利用一个包含116名被归类为对晕厥前期 - 有限下肢负压(LBNP)具有高耐受性的受试者的数据库,我们检验了这样一个假设,即心脏压力反射撤离程度更大(即BRS > 1.0)的受试者会表现出更高的LBNP耐受性,且与更高的HR、PVR和SNA相关。受试者接受LBNP直至出现晕厥前期症状。通过手指光电容积描记法测量平均动脉压和舒张压(MAP;DAP),并自动计算BRS(下降序列)(WinCPRS),即∆R - R间期/∆DAP。在晕厥前期,使用下降BRS(ms/mmHg)将受试者分为两组(第1组 = 下降BRS > 1.0,N = 49;第2组 = 下降BRS < 1.0,N = 67)。通过微神经ography直接从腓神经测量第1组(n = 9)和第2组(n = 10)受试者的肌肉SNA。与第2组(下降BRS < 1.0)相比,第1组(下降BRS > 1.0)的HR较低(107 ± 19对131 ± 20次/分钟),每搏输出量较高(45 ± 15对36 ± 15毫升),SNA较少(45 ± 13对53 ± 7次/分钟),PVR增加较少(4.1 ± 1.3对4.5 ± 2.6)。两组在晕厥前期的耐受时间(1849 ± 260对1839 ± 253秒)、MAP(78 ± 11对79 ± 12 mmHg)、代偿储备指数(CRI)(0.10 ± 0.03对0.09 ± 0.01)和心输出量(4.5 ± 1.2对4.7 ± 1.1升/分钟)相似。与我们的假设相反,较高的HR、PVR、SNA和BRS与对中心血容量减少更大的耐受性无关。这些数据首次证明了个体人类生理策略在补偿中心血容量逐渐减少方面的变异性和独特性。这些综合策略的总和通过代偿储备的测量得到准确反映。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5753/4759043/35d51ae8d973/PHY2-4-e12705-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验