Snyder Peter J, Bhasin Shalender, Cunningham Glenn R, Matsumoto Alvin M, Stephens-Shields Alisa J, Cauley Jane A, Gill Thomas M, Barrett-Connor Elizabeth, Swerdloff Ronald S, Wang Christina, Ensrud Kristine E, Lewis Cora E, Farrar John T, Cella David, Rosen Raymond C, Pahor Marco, Crandall Jill P, Molitch Mark E, Cifelli Denise, Dougar Darlene, Fluharty Laura, Resnick Susan M, Storer Thomas W, Anton Stephen, Basaria Shehzad, Diem Susan J, Hou Xiaoling, Mohler Emile R, Parsons J Kellogg, Wenger Nanette K, Zeldow Bret, Landis J Richard, Ellenberg Susan S
From the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism (P.J.S.), the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (A.J.S.-S., J.T.F., X.H., B.Z., J.R.L., S.S.E.), the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (D. Cifelli, D.D., L.F.), and the Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Section of Vascular Medicine, Department of Medicine (E.R.M.), Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Research Program in Men's Health: Aging and Metabolism, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (S. Bhasin, T.W.S., S. Basaria), and New England Research Institutes, Watertown (R.C.R.) - both in Massachusetts; the Departments of Medicine and Molecular and Cellular Biology, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, Baylor College of Medicine and Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Houston (G.R.C.); Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, and the Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine - both in Seattle (A.M.M.); the Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh (J.A.C.); the Division of Geriatric Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (T.M.G.); the Department of Internal Medicine and Division of Epidemiology, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla (E.B.-C.), the Division of Endocrinology, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center (R.S.S., C.W.), and Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute (R.S.S., C.W.), Torrance, and the Department of Urology, Moores Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego (J.K.P.) - all in California; the Department of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota (K.E.E., S.J.D.), and Minneapolis VA Health Care System (K.E.E.) - both in Minneapolis; the D
N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 18;374(7):611-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506119.
Serum testosterone concentrations decrease as men age, but benefits of raising testosterone levels in older men have not been established.
We assigned 790 men 65 years of age or older with a serum testosterone concentration of less than 275 ng per deciliter and symptoms suggesting hypoandrogenism to receive either testosterone gel or placebo gel for 1 year. Each man participated in one or more of three trials--the Sexual Function Trial, the Physical Function Trial, and the Vitality Trial. The primary outcome of each of the individual trials was also evaluated in all participants.
Testosterone treatment increased serum testosterone levels to the mid-normal range for men 19 to 40 years of age. The increase in testosterone levels was associated with significantly increased sexual activity, as assessed by the Psychosexual Daily Questionnaire (P<0.001), as well as significantly increased sexual desire and erectile function. The percentage of men who had an increase of at least 50 m in the 6-minute walking distance did not differ significantly between the two study groups in the Physical Function Trial but did differ significantly when men in all three trials were included (20.5% of men who received testosterone vs. 12.6% of men who received placebo, P=0.003). Testosterone had no significant benefit with respect to vitality, as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale, but men who received testosterone reported slightly better mood and lower severity of depressive symptoms than those who received placebo. The rates of adverse events were similar in the two groups.
In symptomatic men 65 years of age or older, raising testosterone concentrations for 1 year from moderately low to the mid-normal range for men 19 to 40 years of age had a moderate benefit with respect to sexual function and some benefit with respect to mood and depressive symptoms but no benefit with respect to vitality or walking distance. The number of participants was too few to draw conclusions about the risks of testosterone treatment. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00799617.).
随着男性年龄增长,血清睾酮浓度会下降,但提高老年男性睾酮水平的益处尚未得到证实。
我们将790名65岁及以上、血清睾酮浓度低于每分升275纳克且有雄激素缺乏症状的男性随机分为两组,分别接受睾酮凝胶或安慰剂凝胶治疗1年。每名男性参加了三项试验中的一项或多项,即性功能试验、身体功能试验和活力试验。所有参与者也对每项单独试验的主要结果进行了评估。
睾酮治疗使血清睾酮水平升至19至40岁男性的正常范围中间值。根据性心理每日问卷评估,睾酮水平的升高与性活动显著增加相关(P<0.001),同时性欲和勃起功能也显著增强。在身体功能试验中,两个研究组在6分钟步行距离至少增加50米的男性百分比上没有显著差异,但当纳入所有三项试验的男性时则有显著差异(接受睾酮治疗的男性为20.5%,接受安慰剂的男性为12.6%,P=0.003)。根据慢性病治疗功能评估-疲劳量表评估,睾酮对活力没有显著益处,但接受睾酮治疗的男性报告的情绪略好,抑郁症状严重程度低于接受安慰剂的男性。两组不良事件发生率相似。
在有症状的65岁及以上男性中,将睾酮浓度从适度低水平提高至19至40岁男性的正常范围中间值1年,对性功能有中度益处,对情绪和抑郁症状有一定益处,但对活力或步行距离没有益处。参与者数量过少,无法得出关于睾酮治疗风险的结论。(由美国国立卫生研究院等资助;ClinicalTrials.gov编号,NCT00799617。)