Suppr超能文献

承担风险:教学医院参与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心改善护理捆绑支付计划的早期成果。

Taking Risk: Early Results From Teaching Hospitals' Participation in the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative.

作者信息

Kivlahan Coleen, Orlowski Janis M, Pearce Jonathan, Walradt Jessica, Baker Matthew, Kirch Darrell G

机构信息

C. Kivlahan is senior director, Health Care Affairs, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. J.M. Orlowski is chief health care officer, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. J. Pearce is principal, Singletrack Analytics, Woodbury, New Jersey. J. Walradt is senior payment reform specialist, Alternative Payment, Health Care Affairs, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. M. Baker is research analyst, Health Care Affairs, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. D.G. Kirch is president and chief executive officer, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2016 Jul;91(7):936-42. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001121.

Abstract

The authors describe observations from the 27 teaching hospitals constituting the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) cohort in the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative. CMMI introduced BPCI in August 2011 and selected the first set of participants in January 2013. BPCI participants enter into Medicare payment arrangements for episodes of care for which they take financial risk. The first round of participants entered risk agreements on October 1, 2013 and January 1, 2014. In April 2014, CMMI selected additional participants who started taking financial risk in 2015. Selected episodes include congestive heart failure (CHF), major joint replacement (MJR), and cardiac valve surgery. The AAMC cohort of participating hospitals selected clinical conditions on the basis of patient volume, opportunity to impact savings and quality, organizational and clinical team readiness, and prior process improvement experience. Early financial results suggest that focused attention to postacute care utilization and outcomes, rapid changes in care processes, program pricing rules, and team composition drove savings and losses. The first cohort of participants generated savings in MJR, CHF, and cardiac valve episodes; losses were experienced in stroke, percutaneous coronary intervention, and spine surgery. Although about one-quarter of U.S. teaching hospitals are participating in BPCI, the proliferation of existing and new payment models, as well as the 2015 announcement to increasingly pay providers according to value, mandates close scrutiny of program outcomes. The authors conclude by proposing additional opportunities for research related to alternative payment models.

摘要

作者描述了来自构成美国医学院协会(AAMC)队列的27家教学医院的观察结果,这些医院参与了医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMMI)的改善护理捆绑支付(BPCI)倡议。CMMI于2011年8月推出了BPCI,并于2013年1月挑选了首批参与者。BPCI参与者参与医疗保险针对其承担财务风险的护理事件的支付安排。首批参与者于2013年10月1日和2014年1月1日签订了风险协议。2014年4月,CMMI挑选了更多在2015年开始承担财务风险的参与者。选定的护理事件包括充血性心力衰竭(CHF)、大关节置换(MJR)和心脏瓣膜手术。参与的AAMC队列医院根据患者数量、影响节约和质量的机会、组织和临床团队的准备情况以及先前的流程改进经验来选择临床病症。早期财务结果表明,对急性后护理利用和结果的重点关注、护理流程的快速变化、项目定价规则以及团队构成推动了节约和损失。首批参与者在MJR、CHF和心脏瓣膜护理事件中实现了节约;在中风、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和脊柱手术中出现了损失。尽管约四分之一的美国教学医院参与了BPCI,但现有和新支付模式的激增,以及2015年宣布越来越多地根据价值向提供者支付费用,要求对项目结果进行密切审查。作者最后提出了与替代支付模式相关的更多研究机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验