Robbins T W, Everitt B J, Marston H M, Wilkinson J, Jones G H, Page K J
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, U.K.
Behav Brain Res. 1989 Dec 1;35(3):221-40. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(89)80143-3.
Two experiments examined the effects of excitotoxic lesions of the substantia innominata on cholinergic activity in the neocortex and on performance in a paradigm measuring selective attention in the rat. In Expt. 1, ibotenate-induced lesions produced approximately 30% reductions in cortical choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) activity, and damage to wide regions of the substantia innominata and ventral pallidum. The rats were impaired in their ability to localize brief visual targets in a serial reaction time task, as measured by reduced choice accuracy. This impairment was particularly evident at short stimulus durations, but the lesioned rats did not exhibit evidence of primary visual sensory dysfunction and exhibited only minor deficits when the stimuli were presented unpredictably. The deficit was exacerbated when distracting white noise was interpolated into the task. The rats with lesions were also slower to respond correctly, probably resulting partly from the adoption of a speed/error trade-off strategy, and were slower to collect earned food pellets, although they made no more errors of omission than controls. In Expt. 2, quisqualate-induced lesions produced fewer signs of non-specific damage and 50% reductions in cortical ChAT activity. This lesion produced generally qualitatively similar, but weaker effects to those of ibotenate-induced lesions. It was notable that many of the deficits following either ibotenate- or quisqualate-induced lesions lasted for several months after surgery. The results are discussed in terms of the cholinergic hypothesis of cognitive dysfunction. It is argued that lesions of the substantia innominata, including the magnocellular cholinergic neurons of the nucleus basalis of Meynert, produce deficits in attentional processing, which may not result from damage specifically to cholinergic cells. However, the longevity of the effects makes these preparations suitable for further exploration of the restorative effects of cholinergic treatments.
两项实验研究了无名质的兴奋性毒性损伤对大鼠新皮质胆碱能活性以及对一项测量选择性注意力范式中的行为表现的影响。在实验1中,鹅膏蕈氨酸诱导的损伤使皮质胆碱乙酰转移酶(ChAT)活性降低了约30%,并损害了无名质和腹侧苍白球的大片区域。在一项序列反应时任务中,大鼠定位短暂视觉目标的能力受损,表现为选择准确性降低。这种损伤在短刺激持续时间时尤为明显,但损伤大鼠未表现出原发性视觉感觉功能障碍的迹象,且当刺激不可预测地呈现时仅表现出轻微缺陷。当在任务中插入干扰性白噪声时,缺陷会加剧。损伤大鼠正确反应的速度也较慢,这可能部分是由于采取了速度/错误权衡策略,并且收集获得的食物颗粒的速度也较慢,尽管它们的遗漏错误并不比对照组多。在实验2中, quisqualate诱导的损伤产生的非特异性损伤迹象较少,皮质ChAT活性降低了50%。这种损伤产生的总体影响在性质上与鹅膏蕈氨酸诱导的损伤相似,但较弱。值得注意的是,无论是鹅膏蕈氨酸还是quisqualate诱导的损伤后的许多缺陷在手术后持续了数月。根据认知功能障碍的胆碱能假说来讨论这些结果。有人认为,无名质的损伤,包括梅纳特基底核的大细胞胆碱能神经元,会导致注意力加工缺陷,这可能并非专门由胆碱能细胞损伤所致。然而,这些影响的持久性使这些实验准备适合进一步探索胆碱能治疗的恢复作用。