Mafi-Rad Masih, Luermans Justin G L M, Blaauw Yuri, Janssen Michel, Crijns Harry J, Prinzen Frits W, Vernooy Kevin
From the Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands (M.M.-R., J.G.L.M.L., Y.B., M.J., H.J.C., K.V.); and Department of Physiology, Maastricht University, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, The Netherlands (F.W.P.).
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016 Mar;9(3):e003344. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.115.003344.
Left ventricular septal (LVS) pacing reduces ventricular dyssynchrony and improves cardiac function relative to right ventricular apex (RVA) pacing in animals. We aimed to establish permanent placement of an LVS pacing lead in patients using a transvenous approach through the interventricular septum.
Ten patients with sinus node dysfunction scheduled for dual-chamber pacemaker implantation were prospectively enrolled. A custom pacing lead with extended helix was introduced via the left subclavian vein and, after positioning against the right ventricular septum (RVS) using a preshaped guiding catheter, driven through the interventricular septum to the LVS. The acute hemodynamic effect of RVA, RVS, and LVS pacing was evaluated by invasive LVdP/dtmax measurements. The lead was successfully delivered to the LVS in all patients. Procedure time and fluoroscopy time shortened with experience. QRS duration was shorter during LVS pacing (144 ± 20 ms) than during RVA (172 ± 33 ms; P = 0.02 versus LVS) and RVS pacing (165 ± 17 ms; P = 0.004 versus LVS). RVA and RVS pacing reduced LVdP/dtmax compared with baseline atrial pacing (-7.1 ± 4.1% and -6.9 ± 4.3%, respectively), whereas LVS pacing maintained LVdP/dtmax at baseline level (1.0 ± 4.3%; P = 0.001 versus RVA and RVS). R-wave amplitude and pacing threshold were 12.2 ± 6.7 mV and 0.5 ± 0.2 V at implant and remained stable during 6-month follow-up without lead-related complications.
Permanent placement of an LVS pacing lead by transvenous approach through the interventricular septum is feasible in patients. LVS pacing preserves acute left ventricular pump function. This new pacing method could serve as an alternative and hemodynamically preferable approach for antibradycardia pacing.
在动物实验中,相对于右心室心尖部(RVA)起搏,左心室间隔部(LVS)起搏可减少心室不同步并改善心脏功能。我们旨在通过经静脉途径穿过室间隔,在患者体内永久植入LVS起搏导线。
前瞻性纳入10例计划植入双腔起搏器的窦房结功能障碍患者。通过左锁骨下静脉引入一根带有延长螺旋的定制起搏导线,在使用预塑形引导导管将其置于右心室间隔(RVS)后,驱动其穿过室间隔至LVS。通过有创测量左心室dp/dtmax评估RVA、RVS和LVS起搏的急性血流动力学效应。所有患者的导线均成功送达LVS。随着经验积累,手术时间和透视时间缩短。LVS起搏时的QRS时限(144±20毫秒)短于RVA起搏时(172±33毫秒;与LVS相比,P=0.02)和RVS起搏时(165±17毫秒;与LVS相比,P=0.004)。与基线心房起搏相比,RVA和RVS起搏降低了左心室dp/dtmax(分别为-7.1±4.1%和-6.9±4.3%),而LVS起搏将左心室dp/dtmax维持在基线水平(1.0±4.3%;与RVA和RVS相比,P=0.001)。植入时R波振幅和起搏阈值分别为12.2±6.7毫伏和0.5±0.2伏,在6个月随访期间保持稳定,无导线相关并发症。
经静脉途径穿过室间隔永久植入LVS起搏导线在患者中是可行的。LVS起搏可保留急性左心室泵功能。这种新的起搏方法可作为抗心动过缓起搏的一种替代且血流动力学上更优的方法。