Mesfin Eyob Abera, Taye Bineyam, Belay Getachew, Ashenafi Aytenew
Quality Africa Network (Pty) /GIZ, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Addis Ababa University College of Health Science, School of Medicine Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Oct 14;22:136. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.22.136.7187. eCollection 2015.
The World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa (WHO AFRO) introduces a step wise incremental accreditation approach to improving quality of laboratory and it is a new initiative in Ethiopia and activities are performed for implementation of accreditation program.
Descriptive cross sectional study was conducted in 30 laboratory facilities including 6 laboratory sections to determine their status towards of accreditation using WHO AFRO accreditation checklist and 213 laboratory professionals were interviewed to assess their knowledge on quality system essentials and accreditation in Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
Out of 30 laboratory facilities 1 private laboratory scored 156 (62%) points, which is the minimum required point for WHO accreditation and the least score was 32 (12.8%) points from government laboratory. The assessment finding from each section indicate that 2 Clinical chemistry (55.2% & 62.8%), 2 Hematology (55.2% & 62.8%), 2 Serology (55.2% & 62.8%), 2 Microbiology (55.2% & 62.4%), 1 Parasitology (62.8%) & 1 Urinalysis (61.6%) sections scored the minimum required point for WHO accreditation. The average score for government laboratories was 78.2 (31.2%) points, of these 6 laboratories were under accreditation process with 106.2 (42.5%) average score, while the private laboratories had 71.2 (28.5%) average score. Of 213 respondents 197 (92.5%) professionals had a knowledge on quality system essentials whereas 155 (72.8%) respondents on accreditation.
Although majority of the laboratory professionals had knowledge on quality system and accreditation, laboratories professionals were not able to practice the quality system properly and most of the laboratories had poor status towards the WHO accreditation process. Thus government as well as stakeholders should integrate accreditation program into planning and health policy.
世界卫生组织非洲区域办事处(WHO AFRO)引入了一种逐步递增的认证方法来提高实验室质量,这在埃塞俄比亚是一项新举措,目前正在开展认证计划的实施活动。
在包括6个实验室科室的30个实验室设施中进行了描述性横断面研究,使用WHO AFRO认证清单确定它们的认证状况,并对213名实验室专业人员进行了访谈,以评估他们对埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴质量体系要点和认证的了解。
在30个实验室设施中,1家私立实验室得分为156(62%)分,这是WHO认证所需的最低分数,政府实验室的最低分数为32(12.8%)分。每个科室的评估结果表明,2个临床化学科室(55.2%和62.8%)、2个血液学科室(55.2%和62.8%)、2个血清学科室(55.2%和62.8%)、2个微生物学科室(55.2%和62.4%)、1个寄生虫学科室(62.8%)和1个尿液分析科室(61.6%)达到了WHO认证所需的最低分数。政府实验室的平均分数为78.2(31.2%)分,其中6家实验室正在进行认证,平均分数为106.2(42.5%),而私立实验室的平均分数为71.2(28.5%)。在213名受访者中,197(92.5%)名专业人员了解质量体系要点,而155(72.8%)名受访者了解认证。
虽然大多数实验室专业人员了解质量体系和认证,但实验室专业人员无法正确实施质量体系,并且大多数实验室在WHO认证过程中的状况不佳。因此,政府以及利益相关者应将认证计划纳入规划和卫生政策。