Suppr超能文献

使用超声和锥形束计算机断层扫描评估下颌骨牵张再生:一项临床研究。

Assessment of Mandibular Distraction Regenerate Using Ultrasonography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Clinical Study.

作者信息

Dabas Jitender, Mohanty Sujata, Chaudhary Zainab, Rani Amita

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Maulana Azad Institute of Dental Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Guru Tegh Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2016 Mar;9(1):69-75. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563700. Epub 2015 Sep 24.

Abstract

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is becoming a popular method of reconstruction for maxillofacial bony deformities or defects secondary to trauma or surgical tumor ablation. However, the technique is very sensitive in terms of the rate and rhythm of distraction. Because of this, there is a need for monitoring of the distraction regenerate during the distraction as well as the consolidation period. The present study was conducted to assess the regenerate using two imaging modalities, namely, ultrasonography (USG) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to determine their relative efficacies and to weigh their clinical usefulness in assessment of DO regenerate. The study was conducted on 12 patients (18 sites) who underwent mandibular distraction for correction of facial deformities. The results showed that overall USG correlated better with the condition of regenerate (r = 0.606) as compared with CBCT (r = 0.476). However, USG was less effective as compared with CBCT in assessing the regenerate once corticomedullary differentiation occurred in the bone.

摘要

牵引成骨术(DO)正成为一种用于修复因创伤或手术肿瘤切除继发的颌面骨畸形或缺损的常用方法。然而,该技术在牵引速率和节奏方面非常敏感。因此,在牵引期以及巩固期都需要对牵引再生情况进行监测。本研究旨在使用两种成像方式,即超声检查(USG)和锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)来评估再生情况,以确定它们的相对有效性,并权衡它们在评估牵引成骨术再生中的临床实用性。该研究对12例(18个部位)接受下颌骨牵引以矫正面部畸形的患者进行。结果表明,总体而言,与CBCT(r = 0.476)相比,USG与再生情况的相关性更好(r = 0.606)。然而,在评估骨皮质髓质分化后的再生情况时,USG与CBCT相比效果较差。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Mandibular Distraction Regenerate Using Ultrasonography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Clinical Study.
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2016 Mar;9(1):69-75. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1563700. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
3
Comparative evaluation of the mandibular distraction zone using ultrasonography and conventional radiography.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 May;43(5):587-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.11.016. Epub 2014 Jan 3.
5
Molding of the regenerate in mandibular distraction: Part 1: Laboratory study.
J Craniofac Surg. 2002 Mar;13(2):205-11. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200203000-00004.
6
7
Rat mandibular distraction osteogenesis: latency, rate, and rhythm determine the adaptive response.
J Craniofac Surg. 2001 Mar;12(2):175-82. doi: 10.1097/00001665-200103000-00015.
8
Ultrasound: assessment of the distraction osteogenesis wound in patients undergoing mandibular lengthening.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Oct;61(10):1144-9. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00672-4.
9
Transport osteogenesis in the maxillofacial skeleton: outcomes of a versatile reconstruction method following tumor ablation.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Mar;136(3):243-50. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.2.
10
Evaluation of distracted mandibular bone using computed tomography scan and ultrasonography: technical note.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009 Jul;38(5):274-80. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/22907015.

引用本文的文献

2
Evaluation of Transport Distraction Osteogenesis in Maxillofacial Region.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2025 Feb;24(1):188-199. doi: 10.1007/s12663-024-02137-0. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam computed tomography.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Sep;39(6):323-35. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/19603304.
2
Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jun;38(6):609-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.028. Epub 2009 May 21.
3
Applications of cone beam computed tomography in the practice of oral and maxillofacial surgery.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Apr;66(4):791-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.11.018.
5
Ultrasound: assessment of the distraction osteogenesis wound in patients undergoing mandibular lengthening.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Oct;61(10):1144-9. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00672-4.
6
Ultrasound monitoring of distraction osteogenesis.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Aug;41(4):256-8. doi: 10.1016/s0266-4356(03)00112-8.
7
Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: evaluation of callus distraction by B-scan ultrasonography.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2002 Oct;30(5):286-91. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(02)90307-0.
8
Distraction osteogenesis: past, present, and future.
Facial Plast Surg. 1998;14(3):205-15. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1064346.
9
Comparison of different distraction rates in the mandible: an experimental investigation.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Jun;30(3):220-7. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2001.0046.
10
Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999 Jul;28(4):245-8. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600448.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验