Benito-León Julián, Contador Israel, Mitchell Alex J, Domingo-Santos Ángela, Bermejo-Pareja Félix
Department of Neurology, University Hospital "12 de Octubre", Madrid, Spain.
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;51(2):533-44. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150875.
Evidence regarding the relationship between performance on specific cognitive domains and cause of death is scarce. We assessed whether specific cognitive domains predicted mortality and the presence of any association with specific causes of death in a population-dwelling sample of non-demented older adults. In this population-based, prospective study (NEDICES), 2,390 non-demented subjects ≥65 years completed a brief neuropsychological battery. Cox's proportional hazards models, adjusted by sociodemographic and comorbidity factors, global cognitive performance, educational level, and premorbid intelligence were used to assess the risk of death. Participants were followed for a median of 9.2 years (range 0.01-10.7), after which the death certificates of those who died were examined. 880 (36.8%) of 2,390 participants died over a median follow-up of 5.5 years (range 0.01-10.5). Using adjusted Cox regression models, we found that hazard ratios for mortality in participants within the lowest tertiles (worse performance) were 1.31 (speed of cognitive processing, p = 0.03); 1.22 (semantic fluency, p = 0.04), 1.32 (delayed free recall, p = 0.003), and 1.23 (delayed logical memory, p = 0.03). Poor performance on delayed recall and speed of cognitive processing tests were associated with dementia and cerebrovascular disease mortality, respectively. Further, poor performance on semantic fluency was associated with decreased cancer mortality. In this study of community dwelling non-demented older adults, worse neuropsychological performance was associated with increased risk of mortality. Performance on specific cognitive domains were related to different causes of death. Of particular note there appears to be an inverse association between poor semantic fluency and cancer mortality.
关于特定认知领域表现与死亡原因之间关系的证据很少。我们评估了在非痴呆老年人的社区居住样本中,特定认知领域是否能预测死亡率以及与特定死亡原因之间是否存在关联。在这项基于人群的前瞻性研究(NEDICES)中,2390名年龄≥65岁的非痴呆受试者完成了一套简短的神经心理测试。使用经社会人口学和合并症因素、整体认知表现、教育水平和病前智力调整的Cox比例风险模型来评估死亡风险。对参与者进行了中位时间为9.2年(范围0.01 - 10.7年)的随访,之后检查了死亡者的死亡证明。在2390名参与者中,880名(36.8%)在中位随访5.5年(范围0.01 - 10.5年)期间死亡。使用调整后的Cox回归模型,我们发现处于最低三分位数(表现较差)的参与者的死亡风险比为:1.31(认知处理速度,p = 0.03);1.22(语义流畅性,p = 0.04),1.32(延迟自由回忆,p = 0.003),以及1.23(延迟逻辑记忆,p = 0.03)。延迟回忆和认知处理速度测试表现不佳分别与痴呆和脑血管疾病死亡率相关。此外,语义流畅性表现不佳与癌症死亡率降低相关。在这项对社区居住的非痴呆老年人的研究中,较差的神经心理表现与死亡风险增加相关。特定认知领域的表现与不同的死亡原因有关。特别值得注意的是,语义流畅性差与癌症死亡率之间似乎存在负相关。