Suppr超能文献

产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)和产AmpC酶细菌的治疗选择。

Treatment options for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) and AmpC-producing bacteria.

作者信息

D'Angelo Ryan G, Johnson Jennifer K, Bork Jacqueline T, Heil Emily L

机构信息

a PGY-2 Pharmacotherapy Resident , University of Maryland School of Pharmacy , Baltimore , MD , USA.

b Departments of Pathology and Epidemiology and Public Health , University of Maryland School of Medicine and Microbiology and Virology Laboratories, University of Maryland Medical Center , Baltimore , MD , USA.

出版信息

Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016;17(7):953-67. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2016.1154538. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) and AmpC β-lactamases are increasing causes of resistance in many Gram-negative pathogens of common infections. This has led to a growing utilization of broad spectrum antibiotics, most predominately the carbapenem agents. As the prevalence of ESBL and AmpC-producing isolates and carbapenem resistance has increased, interest in effective alternatives for the management of these infections has also developed.

AREAS COVERED

This article summarizes clinical literature evaluating the utility of carbapenem-sparing regimens for the treatment of ESBL and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae, mainly β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefepime (FEP).

EXPERT OPINION

Based on available data, the use of piperacillin-tazobactam (PTZ) and FEP in the treatment of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae cannot be widely recommended. However, certain infections and patient characteristics may support for effective use of these alternative agents. In the treatment of infections caused by AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae, FEP has been shown to be a clinically useful carbapenem-sparing alternative. Carbapenems and FEP share many structurally similar characteristics in regards to susceptibility to AmpC β-lactamases, which further create confidence in the use FEP in these situations. Patient and infection specific characteristics should be used to employ FEP optimally.

摘要

引言

超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)和AmpCβ-内酰胺酶是常见感染中许多革兰氏阴性病原体耐药性增加的原因。这导致了广谱抗生素的使用日益增加,其中最主要的是碳青霉烯类药物。随着产ESBL和AmpC分离株以及碳青霉烯耐药性的患病率上升,人们对这些感染的有效替代治疗方法的兴趣也在增加。

涵盖领域

本文总结了评估碳青霉烯类药物节省方案治疗产ESBL和AmpC肠杆菌科细菌实用性的临床文献,主要是β-内酰胺-β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合和头孢吡肟(FEP)。

专家意见

根据现有数据,哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(PTZ)和FEP用于治疗产ESBL肠杆菌科细菌不能被广泛推荐。然而,某些感染和患者特征可能支持有效使用这些替代药物。在治疗产AmpC肠杆菌科细菌引起的感染时,FEP已被证明是一种临床上有用的碳青霉烯类药物节省替代方案。碳青霉烯类药物和FEP在对AmpCβ-内酰胺酶的敏感性方面有许多结构相似的特征,这进一步增强了在这些情况下使用FEP的信心。应根据患者和感染的具体特征来最佳地使用FEP。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验