Mahapatra Piyush, Ieong Edmund
West Middlesex University Hospital, London.
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 Feb 8;5(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u209122.w3712. eCollection 2016.
Accurate and detailed documentation of surgical procedures is part of good clinical practice, set out by the General Medical Council (GMC). Knee arthroscopy often involves large data sets which require accurate documentation for future assessment and management. This study assesses the quality of documentation of knee arthroscopy, followed by an evaluation of the implementation of a novel operative proforma. A review of 30 consecutive knee arthroscopy operation notes were analysed for missing information, set against a standardised 30 point criteria. An operation proforma was then introduced, and a further 30 consecutive knee arthroscopy operation notes were analysed. We evaluated allied health professional satisfaction with a Likert point scale survey of 21 allied healthcare professionals (recovery and ward nurses, and physiotherapists) following introduction of the proforma. The mean number of missing items on a 30 point scale was 8.8 (range 0 to 23). Examination under anaesthesia was missed in 43% of cases, tourniquet time in 37% of cases, and wear results in 17% of cases. Following introduction of the proforma, the mean number of missing items was 1.1 (range 0 to 24; p <0.001). This rose to 3.8 after one year (p <0.001) before improvement to 0.7 (p <0.01) with a new and improved proforma. Eighty percent strongly agreed the operation note was clearer, 90% strongly agreed it was more legible, 90% strongly agreed it was more understandable, 50% strongly agreed there was more information recorded, and 100% strongly agreed on the proforma having been improved. Knee arthroscopy is a common procedure with large data sets, which can often be missed or incomplete. A standardised proforma results in a statistically significant improvement in documentation and reduces the incidence of missing information. They are subjectively clearer, more legible, and generally better compared with handwritten notes. This study demonstrates the improvements in healthcare documentation, both clinically and legally, following introduction of a simple proforma. This concept should be applicable to different specialities and procedures in healthcare.
准确而详细地记录手术过程是英国医学总会(GMC)所规定的良好临床实践的一部分。膝关节镜检查通常涉及大量数据集,需要准确记录以便未来进行评估和管理。本研究评估了膝关节镜检查记录的质量,随后对一种新型手术表格的实施情况进行了评估。对连续30份膝关节镜手术记录进行回顾,对照标准化的30分标准分析其中缺失的信息。然后引入一种手术表格,并对另外连续30份膝关节镜手术记录进行分析。在引入该表格后,我们通过对21名联合健康专业人员(康复和病房护士以及物理治疗师)进行李克特量表调查,评估了他们的满意度。在30分制中,缺失项目的平均数量为8.8(范围为0至23)。43%的病例中未记录麻醉下检查情况,37%的病例中未记录止血带使用时间,17%的病例中未记录磨损结果。引入表格后,缺失项目的平均数量为1.1(范围为0至24;p<0.001)。一年后该数字升至3.8(p<0.001),在采用新的改进表格后改善至0.7(p<0.01)。80%的人强烈同意手术记录更清晰,90%的人强烈同意其更易读,90%的人强烈同意其更易懂,50%的人强烈同意记录的信息更多,100%的人强烈同意表格有所改进。膝关节镜检查是一种涉及大量数据集的常见手术,这些数据集常常可能缺失或不完整。标准化表格在记录方面带来了具有统计学意义的改善,并减少了信息缺失的发生率。与手写记录相比,它们在主观上更清晰、更易读,总体上更好。本研究证明了引入一个简单表格后在医疗记录方面的临床和法律改善。这一概念应适用于医疗保健中的不同专科和手术。