Al-Dadah Khalid, Evans Owain, Ali Fazal
Core Surgical Trainee in the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University College London Hospital, London NW1 2BU.
Specialist Registrar in the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield.
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2014 Apr;75(4):227-30. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2014.75.4.227.
The purpose of the study was to assess the quality of documentation of knee arthroscopy and evaluate the implementation of a novel operative template.
A 34-point assessment was undertaken based on published national guidelines. A retrospective study of 50 operative notes of patients (group A) undergoing knee arthroscopy was completed. A new operative note template was devised to include important criteria and assessed in 49 patients (group B) for its efficacy in providing appropriately detailed findings.
Group A was lacking the minimum essential documentation standards expected. Some essential criteria for arthroscopic procedures were as low as 4%. Group B showed a statistically significant increase (P<0.001) in documentation accuracy throughout the essential criteria compared to the findings in group A.
The authors conclude that the use of an evidence-based operative template for knee arthroscopy significantly improves the quality and accuracy of documentation compared to conventional free-hand operative notes.
本研究的目的是评估膝关节镜检查记录的质量,并评估一种新型手术模板的实施情况。
根据已发表的国家指南进行了34分的评估。完成了对50例接受膝关节镜检查患者(A组)手术记录的回顾性研究。设计了一个新的手术记录模板,纳入重要标准,并在49例患者(B组)中评估其在提供适当详细检查结果方面的有效性。
A组缺乏预期的最低基本记录标准。一些关节镜手术的基本标准记录率低至4%。与A组的结果相比,B组在所有基本标准方面的记录准确性有统计学显著提高(P<0.001)。
作者得出结论,与传统的徒手手术记录相比,使用基于证据的膝关节镜手术模板可显著提高记录的质量和准确性。