Herman T S, Jochelson M S, Teicher B A, Scott P J, Hansen J, Clark J R, Pfeffer M R, Gelwan L E, Molnar-Griffin B J, Fraser S M
Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989 Dec;17(6):1273-9. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90536-1.
A Phase I-II trial testing the addition of systemic cisplatin (CDDP) to local hyperthermia and radiation was conducted to determine the dose of cisplatin that is tolerable once weekly for 6 weeks and to estimate the therapeutic potential of this trimodality combination in patients with locally advanced malignancies. Cisplatin at 20 mg/m2 (4 patients), 30 mg/m2 (8 patients), and 40 mg/m2 (12 patients) was given rapidly (over 5-10 min) i.v. after prehydration with 1 liter of normal saline. After approximately two-thirds of the cisplatin dose had been delivered, microwave hyperthermia was begun and continued for 60 min; the target minimum tumor temperature was 43 degrees C. Following hyperthermia, a 400 cGy fraction of radiation was delivered to the tumor. On other days during the treatment weeks, additional 200 cGy fractions were given to total doses of 6,000-6600 cGy in patients with full radiation tolerance or 2400-3600 cGy in patients with limited radiation tolerance. The 24 patients in this trial had a median age of 57 years and the predominant sites/tumor types were head and neck/squamous cell carcinoma (9) and chest wall/breast adenocarcinoma (9). Seventeen of the 24 treated tumors (70%) had previously been irradiated. Eighteen patients (75%) had received prior chemotherapy and nine patients (38%) had previously been treated with cisplatin. Bone marrow suppression was dose limiting in patients heavily pretreated with chemotherapy and chest wall radiation. No significant toxicities were observed at the 20 and 30 mg/m2 dose levels, but 5 of the 12 patients (42%) treated at 40 mg/m2 required modification of the cisplatin dose because of blood count suppression in four patients and mild renal dysfunction in one patient. Each of the patients with bone marrow suppression, however, had been heavily pretreated except for one patient with thrombocytopenia due to hypersplenism. Nausea and vomiting were mild with use of a standard, multiagent antiemetic regimen. Twelve patients (50%) attained a complete regression (CR) and 12 patients (50%) a partial regression (PR). Complete regression appeared to correlate with small tumor volumes (115 cc for CR versus 199 cc for PR patients) and higher tumor temperatures (4.6 average minimum equivalent minutes at 43 degrees C in CR versus 2.0 min in PR patients). Local toxicities included second degree burns in 12 patients (50%) and third degree burns in 6 (25%), but all burns healed in 4-12 weeks without surgical intervention.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
开展了一项I-II期试验,测试在局部热疗和放疗基础上加用全身顺铂(CDDP)的效果,以确定每周一次、共6周可耐受的顺铂剂量,并评估这种三联疗法对局部晚期恶性肿瘤患者的治疗潜力。在预先输注1升生理盐水进行水化后,分别以20mg/m²(4例患者)、30mg/m²(8例患者)和40mg/m²(12例患者)的剂量快速(5-10分钟内)静脉注射顺铂。在大约三分之二的顺铂剂量输注完毕后,开始微波热疗并持续60分钟;目标最低肿瘤温度为43摄氏度。热疗后,向肿瘤给予400cGy的放射剂量。在治疗周的其他日子里,对于放射耐受性良好的患者,额外给予200cGy的放射剂量,总剂量达6000-6600cGy;对于放射耐受性有限的患者,总剂量为2400-3600cGy。该试验中的24例患者中位年龄为57岁,主要部位/肿瘤类型为头颈部/鳞状细胞癌(9例)和胸壁/乳腺腺癌(9例)。24例接受治疗的肿瘤中,有17例(70%)先前接受过放疗。18例患者(75%)接受过先前的化疗,9例患者(38%)先前接受过顺铂治疗。骨髓抑制是化疗和胸壁放疗预处理严重患者的剂量限制因素。在20mg/m²和30mg/m²剂量水平未观察到显著毒性,但在40mg/m²剂量治疗的12例患者中,有5例(42%)因4例患者血细胞计数抑制和1例患者轻度肾功能不全而需要调整顺铂剂量。不过,除1例因脾功能亢进导致血小板减少的患者外,其他骨髓抑制患者均接受过严重预处理。使用标准的多药联合止吐方案后,恶心和呕吐症状较轻。12例患者(50%)达到完全缓解(CR),12例患者(50%)达到部分缓解(PR)。完全缓解似乎与较小的肿瘤体积(CR患者为115立方厘米,PR患者为199立方厘米)和较高的肿瘤温度相关(CR患者在43摄氏度时平均最低等效分钟数为4.6,PR患者为2.0分钟)。局部毒性包括12例患者(50%)出现二度烧伤,6例患者(25%)出现三度烧伤,但所有烧伤均在4-12周内愈合,无需手术干预。(摘要截取自400字)