Comparison of outcomes for patients with lepidic pulmonary adenocarcinoma defined by 2 staging systems: A North American experience.

OBJECTIVE

Application of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (IASLC/ATS/ERS) classification of lepidic adenocarcinomas in conjunction with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging has been challenging. We aimed to compare IASLC/ATS/ERS and AJCC classifications, to determine if they could be integrated as a single staging system.

METHODS

We reviewed patients from 2001-2013 who had AJCC stage I lepidic adenocarcinomas, and categorized them according to IASLC/ATS/ERS guidelines: adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS); minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA); or invasive adenocarcinoma (IA). We integrated the 2 classification systems by separating AIS and MIA as being stage 0, and routinely classifying IA as stage I.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 52 months in 138 patients. The IASLC/ATS/ERS classification demonstrated a higher disease-free survival (DFS) in AIS (100%) and MIA (96%) versus IA (80%) (P = .022), and higher overall survival (OS): 100% for AIS and MIA, versus 90% for IA (P = .049). The AJCC classification identified a DFS of 87% and an OS of 94% for stage I patients. Integration of the 2 systems demonstrated higher DFS in stage 0 (98%) versus I (80%) (P = .006), and higher OS: 100% for stage 0 versus 90% for stage I (P = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

The IASLC/ATS/ERS classification better discriminates AIS and MIA compared with current AJCC staging; however, integration suggests that these categories may be collectively classified in AJCC staging, based on similarly favorable outcomes and distinctive survival rates.