Naoum Christopher, Leipsic Jonathon, Cheung Anson, Ye Jian, Bilbey Nicolas, Mak George, Berger Adam, Dvir Danny, Arepalli Chesnal, Grewal Jasmine, Muller David, Murphy Darra, Hague Cameron, Piazza Nicolo, Webb John, Blanke Philipp
St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Center for Heart Valve Innovation, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Mar;9(3):269-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.08.022. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
The aims of this study were to determine D-shaped mitral annulus (MA) dimensions in control subjects without significant cardiac disease and in patients with moderate to severe mitral regurgitation (MR) being considered for transcatheter mitral therapy and to determine predictors of annular size, using cardiac computed tomography.
The recently introduced D-shaped method of MA segmentation represents a biomechanically appropriate approach for annular sizing prior to transcatheter mitral valve implantation.
Patients who had retrospectively gated cardiac computed tomography performed at our institution (2012 to 2014) and were free of significant cardiac disease were included as controls (n = 88; 56 ± 11 years of age; 47% female) and were compared with patients with moderate or severe MR due to functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) (n = 27) or mitral valve prolapse (MVP) (n = 32). MA dimensions (projected area, perimeter, intercommissural, and septal-to-lateral distance), maximal left atrial (LA) volumes, and phasic left ventricular volumes were measured.
MA dimensions were larger in patients with FMR or MVP compared with controls (area index 4.7 ± 0.6 cm(2)/m(2), 6.0 ± 1.3 cm(2)/m(2), and 7.3 ± 1.7 cm(2)/m(2); perimeter index 59 ± 5 mm/m(2), 67 ± 9 mm/m(2), and 75 ± 10 mm/m(2); intercommissural distance index 20.2 ± 1.9 mm/m(2), 21.2 ± 3.1 mm/m(2), and 24.7 ± 3.2 mm/m(2); septal-to-lateral distance index 14.8 ± 1.6, 18.1 ± 3.3, and 19.5 ± 3.4 mm/m(2) in controls and patients with FMR and MVP, respectively; p < 0.05 between controls and MR subgroups). Absolute MA area was 18% larger in patients with MVP than patients with FMR (13.0 ± 2.9 cm(2) vs. 11.0 ± 2.3 cm(2); p = 0.006). Although LA and left ventricular volumes were both independently associated with MA area index in controls and patients with MVP, only LA volume was associated with annular size in patients with FMR.
Moderate to severe MR was associated with increased MA dimensions, especially among patients with MVP compared with control subjects without cardiac disease. Moreover, unlike in controls and patients with MVP, annular enlargement in FMR was more closely associated with LA dilation.
本研究旨在确定无明显心脏疾病的对照受试者以及考虑接受经导管二尖瓣治疗的中重度二尖瓣反流(MR)患者的D形二尖瓣环(MA)尺寸,并使用心脏计算机断层扫描确定环大小的预测因素。
最近引入的MA分割D形方法是经导管二尖瓣植入术前进行环大小测量的一种生物力学上合适的方法。
将在我们机构(2012年至2014年)进行回顾性门控心脏计算机断层扫描且无明显心脏疾病的患者纳入对照组(n = 88;年龄56±11岁;47%为女性),并与因功能性二尖瓣反流(FMR)导致的中重度MR患者(n = 27)或二尖瓣脱垂(MVP)患者(n = 32)进行比较。测量MA尺寸(投影面积、周长、瓣间距离和间隔到外侧距离)、最大左心房(LA)容积和阶段性左心室容积。
与对照组相比,FMR或MVP患者的MA尺寸更大(面积指数分别为4.7±0.6 cm²/m²、6.0±1.3 cm²/m²和7.3±1.7 cm²/m²;周长指数分别为59±5 mm/m²、67±9 mm/m²和75±10 mm/m²;瓣间距离指数分别为20.2±1.9 mm/m²、21.2±3.1 mm/m²和24.7±3.2 mm/m²;对照组、FMR患者和MVP患者的间隔到外侧距离指数分别为14.8±1.6、18.1±3.3和19.5±3.4 mm/m²;对照组与MR亚组之间p < 0.05)。MVP患者的绝对MA面积比FMR患者大18%(13.0±2.9 cm²对11.0±2.3 cm²;p = 0.006)。虽然LA和左心室容积在对照组和MVP患者中均与MA面积指数独立相关,但在FMR患者中只有LA容积与环大小相关。
中重度MR与MA尺寸增加有关,尤其是与无心脏疾病的对照受试者相比,MVP患者更为明显。此外,与对照组和MVP患者不同,FMR中环扩大与LA扩张的相关性更强。