Wąsik Jacek, Shan Gongbing
Institute of Physical Education and Tourism, Jan Długosz University of Częstochowa, Poland.
Department of Kinesiology, University of Lethbridge, Canada.
Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2015;17(4):115-20.
Taekwondo is famous for its powerful kicking techniques and the roundhouse kick is the most frequently used one. In earlier literature, the influence of a physical target (exiting or not) on kicking power generation has not been given much attention. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the kinematics of roundhouse kick execution and its factors related to power generation. 6 ITF taekwondo practitioners voluntarily participated in this study. They were asked to perform kicks with and without a physical target. The first kick aimed at breaking a board while the second one was a kick into the air. A Smart-D motion capture system (BTS S.p.A., Italy) was used to quantitatively determine their kinematic characteristics during each kick. The main findings showed that kicks aiming at a breaking board were significantly slower than kicks without a physical target (maximal kick-foot velocities were 10.61 ± 0.86 m/s and 14.61 ± 0.67 m/s, respectively, p < 0.01), but the kicking time of the former was shorter (0.58 ± 0.01 s and 0.67 ± 0.01, respectively, p < 0.01). The results suggest that a physical target will negatively influence the kick-foot velocity, which is not necessarily a disadvantage for creating a high quality kick. Possible motor control mechanisms are discussed for the phenomenon. The study made it clear: trainings with and without physical targets would develop different motor control patterns. More studies are needed for identifying the effectiveness of different controls and efficiencies of their training.
跆拳道以其强大的踢腿技术而闻名,其中旋风踢是最常用的一种。在早期文献中,物理目标(是否存在)对踢腿发力的影响并未得到太多关注。因此,本研究的目的是调查旋风踢的运动学及其与发力相关的因素。6名国际跆拳道联盟(ITF)跆拳道练习者自愿参与了本研究。他们被要求分别在有和没有物理目标的情况下进行踢腿。第一次踢腿旨在踢破一块木板,而第二次是在空中踢腿。使用智能D运动捕捉系统(意大利BTS S.p.A.公司)定量确定他们每次踢腿时的运动学特征。主要研究结果表明,踢向木板的踢腿明显比没有物理目标的踢腿速度慢(最大踢腿速度分别为10.61±0.86米/秒和14.61±0.67米/秒,p<0.01),但前者的踢腿时间更短(分别为0.58±0.01秒和0.67±0.01秒,p<0.01)。结果表明,物理目标会对踢腿速度产生负面影响,但这不一定不利于踢出高质量的踢腿。针对这一现象讨论了可能的运动控制机制。该研究明确指出:有和没有物理目标的训练会形成不同的运动控制模式。需要更多研究来确定不同控制方式的有效性及其训练效率。