Strik Marc, Defaye Pascal, Eschalier Romain, Mondoly Pierre, Frontera Antonio, Ritter Philippe, Haïssaguerre Michel, Ploux Sylvain, Ellenbogen Kenneth A, Bordachar Pierre
Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux; LIRYC institute, Pessac, France; Maastricht University Medical Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, La Tronche, France.
Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jun;13(6):1266-73. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.02.008. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
In Boston Scientific dual-chamber devices, the RYTHMIQ algorithm aims to minimize right ventricular pacing.
We evaluated the performance of this algorithm determining (1) the appropriateness of the switch from the AAI(R) mode with backup VVI pacing to the DDD(R) mode in case of suspected loss of atrioventricular (AV) conduction and (2) the rate of recorded pacemaker-mediated tachycardia (PMT) when AV hysteresis searches for restored AV conduction.
In this multicenter study, we included 157 patients with a Boston Scientific dual-chamber device (40 pacemakers and 117 implantable cardioverter-defibrillators) without permanent AV conduction disorder and with the RYTHMIQ algorithm activated. We reviewed the last 10 remote monitoring-transmitted RYTHMIQ and PMT episodes.
We analyzed 1266 episodes of switch in 142 patients (90%): 207 (16%) were appropriate and corresponded to loss of AV conduction, and 1059 (84%) were inappropriate, of which 701 (66%) were related to compensatory pause (premature atrial contraction, 7%; premature ventricular contraction, 597 (56%); or both, 27 (3%)) or to a premature ventricular contraction falling in the post-atrial pacing ventricular refractory period interval (219, 21%) and 94 (10%) were related to pacemaker dysfunction. One hundred fifty-four PMT episodes were diagnosed in 27 patients (17%). In 85 (69%) of correctly diagnosed episodes, the onset of PMT was directly related to the algorithm-related prolongation of the AV delay, promoting AV dissociation and retrograde conduction.
This study highlights some of the limitations of the RYTHMIQ algorithm: high rate of inappropriate switch and high rate of induction of PMT. This may have clinical implications in terms of selection of patients and may suggest required changes in the algorithm architecture.
在波士顿科学公司的双腔设备中,RYTHMIQ算法旨在尽量减少右心室起搏。
我们评估了该算法的性能,确定(1)在怀疑房室(AV)传导丧失时,从具有备用VVI起搏的AAI(R)模式切换到DDD(R)模式的适宜性,以及(2)当AV滞后搜索恢复的AV传导时,记录的起搏器介导的心动过速(PMT)发生率。
在这项多中心研究中,我们纳入了157例植入波士顿科学公司双腔设备的患者(40台起搏器和117台植入式心脏复律除颤器),这些患者无永久性AV传导障碍且激活了RYTHMIQ算法。我们回顾了最近10次远程监测传输的RYTHMIQ和PMT事件。
我们分析了142例患者(90%)的1266次切换事件:207次(16%)是适宜的,对应于AV传导丧失,1059次(84%)是不适宜的,其中701次(66%)与代偿性间歇有关(房性早搏,7%;室性早搏,597次(56%);或两者兼有,27次(3%)),或与落在心房起搏后心室不应期内的室性早搏有关(219次,21%),94次(10%)与起搏器功能障碍有关。在27例患者(17%)中诊断出154次PMT事件。在85次(69%)正确诊断的事件中,PMT的发作与算法相关的AV延迟延长直接相关,促进了AV分离和逆行传导。
本研究突出了RYTHMIQ算法的一些局限性:不适宜切换率高和PMT诱发率高。这可能在患者选择方面具有临床意义,并可能提示算法架构需要改变。