Otten Marte
University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 22;11(2):e0149158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149158. eCollection 2016.
It is known that faces are rapidly and even unconsciously categorized into social groups (black vs. white, male vs. female). Here, I test whether preferences for specific social groups guide attention, using a visual search paradigm. In Experiment 1 participants searched displays of neutral faces for an angry or frightened target face. Black target faces were detected more efficiently than white targets, indicating that black faces attracted more attention. Experiment 2 showed that attention differences between black and white faces were correlated with individual differences in automatic race preference. In Experiment 3, using happy target faces, the attentional preference for black over white faces was eliminated. Taken together, these results suggest that automatic preferences for social groups guide attention to individuals from negatively valenced groups, when people are searching for a negative emotion such as anger or fear.
众所周知,面孔会迅速甚至在无意识的情况下被归类为社会群体(黑人与白人、男性与女性)。在此,我使用视觉搜索范式来测试对特定社会群体的偏好是否会引导注意力。在实验1中,参与者在中性面孔的展示中搜索愤怒或恐惧的目标面孔。黑色目标面孔比白色目标面孔被更高效地检测到,这表明黑色面孔吸引了更多注意力。实验2表明,黑人和白人面孔之间的注意力差异与自动种族偏好的个体差异相关。在实验3中,使用快乐的目标面孔,对黑色面孔相对于白色面孔的注意力偏好被消除了。综合来看,这些结果表明,当人们在寻找愤怒或恐惧等负面情绪时,对社会群体的自动偏好会将注意力引导到具有负面效价群体的个体上。