Suppr超能文献

跨种族效应中的编码后认知过程:人脸识别过程中的分类与个体化

Postencoding cognitive processes in the cross-race effect: Categorization and individuation during face recognition.

作者信息

Ho Michael R, Pezdek Kathy

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Claremont Graduate University, 150 East 10th Street, Claremont, CA, 91711, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Jun;23(3):771-80. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0945-x.

Abstract

The cross-race effect (CRE) describes the finding that same-race faces are recognized more accurately than cross-race faces. According to social-cognitive theories of the CRE, processes of categorization and individuation at encoding account for differential recognition of same- and cross-race faces. Recent face memory research has suggested that similar but distinct categorization and individuation processes also occur postencoding, at recognition. Using a divided-attention paradigm, in Experiments 1A and 1B we tested and confirmed the hypothesis that distinct postencoding categorization and individuation processes occur during the recognition of same- and cross-race faces. Specifically, postencoding configural divided-attention tasks impaired recognition accuracy more for same-race than for cross-race faces; on the other hand, for White (but not Black) participants, postencoding featural divided-attention tasks impaired recognition accuracy more for cross-race than for same-race faces. A social categorization paradigm used in Experiments 2A and 2B tested the hypothesis that the postencoding in-group or out-group social orientation to faces affects categorization and individuation processes during the recognition of same-race and cross-race faces. Postencoding out-group orientation to faces resulted in categorization for White but not for Black participants. This was evidenced by White participants' impaired recognition accuracy for same-race but not for cross-race out-group faces. Postencoding in-group orientation to faces had no effect on recognition accuracy for either same-race or cross-race faces. The results of Experiments 2A and 2B suggest that this social orientation facilitates White but not Black participants' individuation and categorization processes at recognition. Models of recognition memory for same-race and cross-race faces need to account for processing differences that occur at both encoding and recognition.

摘要

跨种族效应(CRE)描述了这样一个发现:人们对同种族面孔的识别比对跨种族面孔的识别更准确。根据关于跨种族效应的社会认知理论,编码时的分类和个体化过程解释了对同种族和跨种族面孔的不同识别情况。最近的面部记忆研究表明,在识别阶段,即编码后,也会出现类似但不同的分类和个体化过程。在实验1A和1B中,我们使用分心范式测试并证实了以下假设:在识别同种族和跨种族面孔的过程中,会出现不同的编码后分类和个体化过程。具体来说,编码后的构型分心任务对同种族面孔识别准确性的损害比对跨种族面孔更大;另一方面,对于白人(而非黑人)参与者,编码后的特征分心任务对跨种族面孔识别准确性的损害比对同种族面孔更大。实验2A和2B中使用的社会分类范式测试了以下假设:编码后面对面孔的内群体或外群体社会取向会影响在识别同种族和跨种族面孔时的分类和个体化过程。编码后面对外群体面孔的取向导致白人参与者进行分类,但黑人参与者没有。白人参与者对同种族但非跨种族外群体面孔的识别准确性受损证明了这一点。编码后面对内群体面孔的取向对同种族或跨种族面孔的识别准确性均无影响。实验2A和2B的结果表明,这种社会取向促进了白人而非黑人参与者在识别时的个体化和分类过程。同种族和跨种族面孔的识别记忆模型需要考虑在编码和识别阶段出现的加工差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验