Siracusa Margherita, Grappasonni Iolanda, Petrelli Fabio
Scuola di Scienze del Farmaco e dei Prodotti della Salute, Università di Camerino (Macerata).
Recenti Prog Med. 2016 Jan;107(1):19-24. doi: 10.1701/2132.23100.
This study proposes an analysis of the boundaries of liability of the negligent hospital pharmacist, in relation with the liability of the hospital. The conditions of departure are: the knowledge that the pharmacist works within the limits of compliance programs adopted by the hospital; the finding that, in recent times, there has been an expansion in the objective sense of liability of the pharmacist. The laudable aim of protecting the patient is well accompanied by the violation of the principle of individual criminal liability (Art. 27 of the Constitution) and practical reason for discouraging the risky assets even useful. Through the analysis of the d. lgs. n. 231/2001 regarding the corporate liability for the crime and law n. 158/2012 regarding criminal liability limited to the gross negligence of the health care, it will arrive at the conclusion about the need to recognize a liability for the organization to hospitals, limiting the liability of the hospital pharmacist to cases of chargeability/criminal liability of negligent conduct.
本研究提议分析疏忽大意的医院药剂师的责任界限,并与医院的责任相关联。出发条件是:知晓药剂师在医院采用的合规计划范围内工作;发现在最近,药剂师责任的客观意义有所扩大。保护患者这一值得称赞的目标,却伴随着对个人刑事责任原则(宪法第27条)的违反,以及即便有用却抑制风险资产的实际理由。通过分析关于犯罪的企业责任的第231/2001号法令和关于限于医疗保健重大过失的刑事责任的第158/2012号法律,将得出关于有必要认可医院组织责任的结论,将医院药剂师的责任限制在疏忽行为可归责/刑事责任的情形。