Aguirre-Acevedo Daniel C, Lopera Francisco, Henao Eliana, Tirado Victoria, Muñoz Claudia, Giraldo Margarita, Bangdiwala Shrikant I, Reiman Eric M, Tariot Pierre N, Langbaum Jessica B, Quiroz Yakeel T, Jaimes Fabian
Neuroscience Group of Antioquia, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia2Academic Group of Clinical Epidemiology, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Neuroscience Group of Antioquia, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
JAMA Neurol. 2016 Apr;73(4):431-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.4851.
Data from an autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD) kindred were used to track the longitudinal trajectory of cognitive decline associated with preclinical ADAD and explore factors that may modify the rate of cognitive decline.
To evaluate the onset and rate of cognitive decline during preclinical ADAD and the effect of socioeconomic, vascular, and genetic factors on the cognitive decline.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a retrospective cohort study from January 1, 1995, through June 31, 2012, of individuals from Antioquia, Colombia, who tested positive for the ADAD-associated PSEN1 E280A mutation. Data analysis was performed from August 20, 2014, through November 30, 2015. A mixed-effects model was used to estimate annual rates of change in cognitive test scores and to mark the onset of cognitive decline.
Memory, language, praxis, and total scores from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer Disease test battery. Chronologic age was used as a time scale in the models. We explore the effects of sex; educational level; socioeconomic status; residence area; occupation type; marital status; history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia; tobacco and alcohol use; and APOE ε4 on the rates of cognitive decline.
A total of 493 carriers met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. A total of 256 carriers had 2 or more assessments. At the time of the initial assessment, participants had a mean (SD) age of 33.4 (11.7) years and a mean (SD) educational level of 7.2 (4.2) years. They were predominantly female (270 [54.8%]), married (293 [59.4%]), and of low socioeconomic status (322 [65.3%]). Word list recall scores provided the earliest indicator of preclinical cognitive decline at 32 years of age, 12 and 17 years before the kindred's respective median ages at mild cognitive impairment and dementia onset. After the change point, carriers had a statistically significant cognitive decline with a loss of 0.24 (95% CI, -0.26 to -0.22) points per year for the word list recall test and 2.13 (95% CI, -2.29 to -1.96) points per year for total scores. Carriers with high educational levels had an increase of approximately 36% in the rate of cognitive decline after the change point when compared with those with low educational levels (-2.89 vs -2.13 points per year, respectively). Onset of cognitive decline was delayed by 3 years in individuals with higher educational levels compared with those with lower educational levels. Those with higher educational level, middle/high socioeconomic status, history of diabetes and hypertension, and tobacco and alcohol use had a steeper cognitive decline after onset.
Preclinical cognitive decline was evident in PSEN1 E280A mutation carriers 12 years before the onset of clinical impairment. Educational level may be a protective factor against the onset of cognitive impairment.
来自一个常染色体显性阿尔茨海默病(ADAD)家族的数据被用于追踪与临床前ADAD相关的认知衰退的纵向轨迹,并探索可能改变认知衰退速率的因素。
评估临床前ADAD期间认知衰退的起始和速率,以及社会经济、血管和遗传因素对认知衰退的影响。
设计、背景和参与者:我们于1995年1月1日至2012年6月31日对来自哥伦比亚安蒂奥基亚的、ADAD相关的PSEN1 E280A突变检测呈阳性的个体进行了一项回顾性队列研究。数据分析于2014年8月20日至2015年11月30日进行。使用混合效应模型来估计认知测试分数的年变化率,并确定认知衰退的起始点。
阿尔茨海默病注册协会测试组套中的记忆、语言、实践和总分。在模型中使用实际年龄作为时间尺度。我们探讨了性别、教育水平、社会经济地位、居住地区、职业类型、婚姻状况、高血压、糖尿病和血脂异常病史、烟草和酒精使用,以及APOE ε4对认知衰退速率的影响。
共有493名携带者符合纳入标准并进行了分析。共有256名携带者进行了2次或更多次评估。在初次评估时,参与者的平均(标准差)年龄为33.4(11.7)岁,平均(标准差)教育水平为7.2(4.2)年。他们主要为女性(270名[54.8%])、已婚(293名[59.4%]),且社会经济地位较低(322名[65.3%])。单词列表回忆分数是临床前认知衰退的最早指标,出现在32岁时,比该家族轻度认知障碍和痴呆发病的各自中位年龄提前12年和第17年。在变化点之后,携带者出现了具有统计学意义的认知衰退,单词列表回忆测试每年下降0.24(95%置信区间,-0.26至-0.22)分,总分每年下降2.13(95%置信区间,-2.29至-1.96)分。与低教育水平的携带者相比,高教育水平的携带者在变化点之后认知衰退速率增加了约36%(分别为每年-2.89分和-2.13分)。与低教育水平的个体相比,高教育水平的个体认知衰退起始延迟了3年。那些教育水平较高、社会经济地位中/高、有糖尿病和高血压病史以及使用烟草和酒精的个体在发病后认知衰退更为陡峭。
在临床损害出现前12年,PSEN1 E280A突变携带者中临床前认知衰退就已明显。教育水平可能是预防认知障碍发生的一个保护因素。