Taylor J Eric T, Rajsic Jason, Pratt Jay
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, 100 St. George St., Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G3, Canada.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 May;78(4):988-95. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1074-y.
The visual system allocates attention in object-based and location-based modes. However, the question of when attention selects objects and when it selects locations remains poorly understood. In this article, we present variations on two classic paradigms from the object-based attention literature, in which object-based effects are observed only when the object feature matches the task goal of the observer. In Experiment 1, covert orienting was influenced by task-irrelevant rectangles, but only when the target color matched the rectangle color. In Experiment 2, the region of attentional focus was adjusted to the size of task-irrelevant objects, but only when the target color matched the object color. In Experiment 3, we ruled out the possibility that contingent object-based selection is caused by color-based intratrial priming. These demonstrations of contingent object-based attention suggest that object-based selection is neither mandatory nor default, and that object-based effects are contingent on simple, top-down attentional control settings.
视觉系统以基于对象和基于位置的模式分配注意力。然而,关于注意力何时选择对象以及何时选择位置的问题仍知之甚少。在本文中,我们展示了基于对象注意力文献中两个经典范式的变体,其中只有当对象特征与观察者的任务目标匹配时,才会观察到基于对象的效应。在实验1中,隐蔽定向受到与任务无关的矩形的影响,但只有当目标颜色与矩形颜色匹配时才会如此。在实验2中,注意力焦点区域被调整为与任务无关对象的大小,但同样只有当目标颜色与对象颜色匹配时才会这样。在实验3中,我们排除了偶然基于对象的选择是由基于颜色的试验内启动引起的可能性。这些关于偶然基于对象注意力的演示表明,基于对象的选择既不是强制性的也不是默认的,并且基于对象的效应取决于简单的自上而下的注意力控制设置。