Tang Fang, Zhou Rui, Cheng Zeneng, Yang Guoping, Chen Aiqiao, Liu Zhi, Tan Hongyi, Yang Shuang, Li Sanwang, Mu Lingli, Yu Peng
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Acta Pharm Sin B. 2016 Jan;6(1):71-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2015.10.003. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
The aim of this study was to apply the reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) approach to evaluate the bioequivalence of 2 formulations of agomelatine, and to investigate the pharmacokinetic properties of agomelatine in Chinese healthy male subjects. This was performed in a single-dose, randomized-sequence, open-label, four-way crossover study with a one-day washout period between doses. Healthy Chinese males were randomly assigned to receive 25 mg of either the test or reference formulation. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the log-transformed ratios and ratio of geometric means (GMR) of AUC and C max of agomelatine were within the predetermined bioequivalence range based on RSABE method. Results showed that both of the 90% CIs for the log-transformed ratios of AUC and C max of 7-desmethyl-agomelatine and 3-hydroxy-agomelatine were within the predetermined bioequivalence range. The 90% CIs for natural log-transformed ratios of C max, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ of agomelatine (104.42-139.86, 101.33-123.83 and 97.90-117.94) were within the RSABE acceptance limits, and 3-hydroxy-agomelatine (105.55-123.03, 101.95-109.10 and 101.72-108.70) and 7-desmethyl-agomelatine (104.50-125.23, 102.36-111.50 and 101.62-110.64) were within the FDA bioequivalence definition intervals (0.80-1.25 for AUC and 0.75-1.33 for C max). The RSABE approach was successful in evaluating the bioequivalence of these two formulations.
本研究旨在应用参考标化平均生物等效性(RSABE)方法评估阿戈美拉汀两种制剂的生物等效性,并在中国健康男性受试者中研究阿戈美拉汀的药代动力学特性。这是在一项单剂量、随机序列、开放标签、四交叉试验中进行的,各剂量之间有一天的洗脱期。健康中国男性被随机分配接受25mg的试验制剂或参比制剂。如果基于RSABE方法,阿戈美拉汀AUC和Cmax的对数转换比值及几何均值比(GMR)的90%置信区间(CI)在预定的生物等效性范围内,则认为两种制剂具有生物等效性。结果显示,7-去甲基阿戈美拉汀和3-羟基阿戈美拉汀的AUC和Cmax对数转换比值的90%CI均在预定的生物等效性范围内。阿戈美拉汀Cmax、AUC0-t和AUC0-∞的自然对数转换比值的90%CI(分别为104.42 - 139.86、101.33 - 123.83和97.90 - 117.94)在RSABE接受限度内,3-羟基阿戈美拉汀(105.55 - 123.03、101.95 - 109.10和101.72 - 108.70)和7-去甲基阿戈美拉汀(104.50 - 125.23、102.36 - 111.50和101.62 - 110.64)在FDA生物等效性定义区间内(AUC为0.80 - 1.25,Cmax为0.75 - 1.33)。RSABE方法成功地评估了这两种制剂的生物等效性。