Suppr超能文献

产时电子胎儿监护中的胎儿性别差异

Fetal Sex Differences in Intrapartum Electronic Fetal Monitoring.

作者信息

Porter Anne C, Triebwasser Jourdan E, Tuuli Methodius, Caughey Aaron B, Macones George A, Cahill Alison G

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 2016 Jul;33(8):786-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1572531. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

Abstract

Objective The article aimed to estimate differences in electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) patterns in term gestations attributable to fetal sex. Study Design We conducted a prospective cohort study of consecutive, singleton, nonanomalous, term gestations that labored during admission. EFM characteristics in the 30 minutes prior to delivery were evaluated. Logistic regression models estimated adjusted risks for EFM features by sex. To further estimate the impact of sex, we limited the analysis to gestations without composite morbidity (morbidity defined as arterial cord pH <7.20, 5-minute Apgar <7, or neonatal intensive care unit admission). Results Of 2,639 deliveries, 1,400 (53%) were male. Male fetuses had a higher number of decelerations (median [interquartile range]: 8 [5, 11] vs. 7 [4, 10], p < 0.003) and increased total deceleration area (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] :1.04, 1.18). Male fetuses were at increased risk for prolonged decelerations (aOR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.42) and repetitive variable decelerations (aOR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.47). Among neonates without composite morbidity (n = 2,446, 92.7%), male sex conferred an increased risk of late decelerations (aOR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.43) and increased total deceleration area (aOR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.20). Conclusion There are significant sex differences in EFM patterns at term among pregnancies without evidence of acidemia. This suggests that interpretation of EFM patterns may need to take into account factors such as fetal sex.

摘要

目的

本文旨在评估足月妊娠中因胎儿性别导致的电子胎儿监护(EFM)模式差异。

研究设计

我们对入院期间分娩的连续单胎、无畸形的足月妊娠进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。评估了分娩前30分钟的EFM特征。逻辑回归模型估计了按性别划分的EFM特征的调整风险。为了进一步评估性别的影响,我们将分析局限于无合并症的妊娠(合并症定义为脐动脉血pH<7.20、5分钟阿氏评分<7或新生儿重症监护病房入院)。

结果

在2639例分娩中,1400例(53%)为男性。男性胎儿减速次数更多(中位数[四分位间距]:8[5,11]对7[4,10],p<0.003),总减速面积增加(调整优势比[aOR]:1.11,95%置信区间[CI]:1.04,1.18)。男性胎儿出现延长减速(aOR:1.21,95%CI:1.03,1.42)和反复可变减速(aOR:1.24,95%CI:1.05,1.47)的风险增加。在无合并症的新生儿中(n = 2446,92.7%),男性发生晚期减速(aOR:1.21,95%CI:1.02,1.43)和总减速面积增加(aOR:1.12,95%CI:1.05,1.20)的风险增加。

结论

在无酸血症证据的足月妊娠中,EFM模式存在显著的性别差异。这表明在解读EFM模式时可能需要考虑胎儿性别等因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验