Warren Laura E G, Kim Miranda B, Martin Neil E, Shih Helen A
Harvard Radiation Oncology Program; Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
Harvard Radiation Oncology Program; Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Apr;12(4):e487-94. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.007583. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
Patient care within radiation oncology extends beyond the clinic or treatment hours. The on-call radiation oncologist is often not a patient's primary radiation oncologist, introducing the possibility of communication breakdowns and medical errors. This study analyzed after-hours telephone calls to identify opportunities for improved patient safety and quality of care.
Patient calls received outside of business hours between July 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014, at two academic radiation oncology departments were retrospectively reviewed. All calls were analyzed using content analysis, and descriptive analyses were performed.
During this time, 5,557 courses of radiotherapy (RT) were delivered. A total of 454 calls were received from 369 unique patients (81%), averaging 4.4 calls per week per department. Phone encounters were documented for 223 calls (49%). The calls were categorized by disease site (No., %): central nervous system (91, 20%), head and neck (78, 17%), genitourinary (53, 12%), GI (52, 12%), thoracic (51, 11%), gynecologic (30, 7%), breast (24, 5%), and other (75, 17%). Patients most often called regarding acute medical, non-RT-related issues (144 calls, 32%); acute RT-related adverse effects (127, 28%); and medication management, including refills (63, 14%).
This analysis provided novel information regarding the volume of and reasons for after-hours patient-initiated telephone calls. It identified opportunities for actionable improvements in safety and quality of care, particularly with regard to documentation by on-call providers, communication with the primary radiation oncology and extended health care teams, patient education about common RT adverse effects, and medication management.
放射肿瘤学中的患者护理超出了诊所或治疗时间的范围。值班放疗肿瘤学家通常不是患者的主治放疗肿瘤学家,这就增加了沟通中断和医疗差错的可能性。本研究分析了非工作时间的电话,以确定改善患者安全和护理质量的机会。
对2013年7月1日至2014年6月30日期间两个学术性放射肿瘤学部门在非工作时间接到的患者电话进行回顾性审查。所有电话均采用内容分析法进行分析,并进行描述性分析。
在此期间,共进行了5557个放射治疗疗程。共接到369名不同患者打来的454个电话(81%),每个部门平均每周接到4.4个电话。记录了223个电话(49%)的电话沟通情况。电话按疾病部位分类(数量、%):中枢神经系统(91,20%)、头颈部(78,17%)、泌尿生殖系统(53,12%)、胃肠道(52,12%)、胸部(51,11%)、妇科(30,7%)、乳腺(24,5%)和其他(75,17%)。患者打电话最常见的原因是急性医疗、与放疗无关的问题(144个电话,32%);急性放疗相关不良反应(127个,28%);以及药物管理,包括续方(63个,14%)。
本分析提供了有关非工作时间患者发起电话的数量和原因的新信息。它确定了在安全和护理质量方面可采取行动进行改进的机会,特别是在值班人员的记录、与主治放疗肿瘤学团队和扩展医疗团队的沟通、对患者进行常见放疗不良反应的教育以及药物管理方面。