Sanderson Christine, Quinn Stephen J, Agar Meera, Chye Richard, Clark Katherine, Doogue Matthew, Fazekas Belinda, Lee Jessica, Lovell Melanie R, Rowett Debra, Spruyt Odette, Currow David C
Department of Palliative Medicine, Calvary Health Care Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia CareSearch, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Flinders Clinical Effectiveness, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2016 Sep;6(3):323-30. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000825. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
Real-world effectiveness of many medications has been poorly researched, including in hospice/palliative care. Directly extrapolating findings from other clinical settings may not yield robust clinical advice. Pharmacovigilance studies provide an opportunity to understand better the net impact of medications. The study aimed to examine immediate and short-term benefits and harms of pregabalin in routine practice for neuropathic pain in hospice/palliative care.
A consecutive cohort of 155 patients from 62 centres in 5 countries was started on pregabalin and studied prospectively. Data were collected at three time points: baseline; day 7 (immediate, short-term harms); ad hoc reports of any harms ≤21 days; and day 21 (short-term benefits).
Median dose for 155 patients at day 21 was 150 mg/24 h. Benefits were reported by 61 patients (39%), of whom 11 (7%) experienced complete pain resolution. Harms were reported by 51 (35%) patients at or before 7 days, the most frequent of which were somnolence, fatigue, cognitive disturbance and dizziness. 10 patients (6%) ceased pregabalin due to harms, but 82 patients (53%) were being treated at 21 days. In regression modelling, people with worse baseline pain derived more benefit (OR=8.5 (95% CI 2.5 to 28.68).
Pregabalin delivered benefit to many patients, with 4 of 10 experiencing pain reductions by 21 days. Harms, occurring in 1 in 3 patients, may be difficult to detect in clinical practice, as they mostly involve worsening of symptoms prevalent at baseline.
包括临终关怀/姑息治疗在内,许多药物的实际疗效研究不足。直接推断其他临床环境中的研究结果可能无法得出可靠的临床建议。药物警戒研究为更好地理解药物的净影响提供了机会。本研究旨在探讨普瑞巴林在临终关怀/姑息治疗中治疗神经性疼痛的常规实践中的即时和短期益处及危害。
来自5个国家62个中心的155例患者连续队列开始服用普瑞巴林,并进行前瞻性研究。在三个时间点收集数据:基线;第7天(即时、短期危害);≤21天内任何危害的临时报告;以及第21天(短期益处)。
155例患者在第21天的中位剂量为150mg/24小时。61例患者(39%)报告有获益,其中11例(7%)疼痛完全缓解。51例(35%)患者在第7天或之前报告有危害,最常见的是嗜睡、疲劳、认知障碍和头晕。10例患者(6%)因危害而停用普瑞巴林,但82例患者(53%)在第21天仍在接受治疗。在回归模型中,基线疼痛较重的患者获益更多(OR=8.5(95%CI 2.5至28.68))。
普瑞巴林使许多患者获益,十分之四的患者在21天内疼痛减轻。三分之一的患者出现危害,在临床实践中可能难以发现,因为它们大多涉及基线时普遍存在的症状恶化。