Suppr超能文献

丹麦针对屋尘螨呼吸道过敏性疾病的舌下免疫疗法与皮下免疫疗法的成本最小化分析。

Cost-minimization analysis of sublingual immunotherapy versus subcutaneous immunotherapy for house dust mite respiratory allergic disease in Denmark.

作者信息

Rønborg Steen, Johnsen Claus R, Theilgaard Sune, Winther Anders, Hahn-Pedersen Julie, Andreasen Jakob Nørgaard, Olsen Jens

机构信息

a Allergi-og Lungeklinikken , Valby , Denmark ;

b Department of Dermato-Allergology , Copenhagen University Hospital , Gentofte , Denmark ;

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2016 Aug;19(8):735-41. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2016.1158718. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

Abstract

Objectives Currently, patients with persistent moderate-to-severe house dust mite (HDM) allergic rhinitis despite use of symptom-relieving medication can be offered subcutaneously administered allergy immunotherapy (SQ SCIT; Alutard SQ) as standard care of treatment in Denmark. Recently, a HDM sublingually administered allergy immunotherapy tablet (SQ SLIT-tablet; ACARIZAX) has been developed for at-home treatment. The purpose of this analysis is to compare the costs related to treatment and administration of SQ SLIT-tablet and SQ SCIT. Methods Assuming equal efficacy between ther SQ SLIT-tablet and SQ SCIT, the cost-minimization analysis was the most appropriate for the comparison. According to guidelines and Summary of Product Characteristics, the treatment duration of SQ SLIT-tablet is 3 years and 3-5 years for SQ SCIT. The courses of treatment vary among patients and, therefore, the costs of treatment have been calculated for an average patient with HDM respiratory allergic disease (RAD) receiving either SQ SLIT-tablet or SQ SCIT. All costs associated with allergy immunotherapy were collected, i.e., cost of medication, administration and treatment setting, and discounted according to Danish guidelines. Comprehensive univariate sensitivity analyses were carried out. Results The treatment costs for an average patient with HDM RAD are €3094 for SQ SLIT-tablet and €3799 for SQ SCIT; however, when adding indirect costs to the calculations the total costs of the treatments are €3697 and €6717 for SQ SLIT-tablet and SQ SCIT, respectively. Therefore, if 2500 patients with HDM RAD were treated with SQ SLIT-tablet instead of SQ SCIT, it would elicit a saving to the healthcare system of ∼€1.8 million. The conclusion was robust to any changes in the sensitivity analysis. Conclusion With regards to the cost of treating Danish patients with HDM RAD, it is clearly cost-saving to treat patients with SQ SLIT-tablet compared to SQ SCIT.

摘要

目的 目前,在丹麦,尽管使用了缓解症状的药物,但仍患有持续性中重度屋尘螨(HDM)过敏性鼻炎的患者可接受皮下注射过敏免疫疗法(SQ SCIT;阿罗格SQ)作为标准治疗方案。最近,已研发出一种用于家庭治疗的HDM舌下含服过敏免疫疗法片剂(SQ SLIT-片剂;阿立卡)。本分析的目的是比较SQ SLIT-片剂和SQ SCIT的治疗及给药相关成本。方法 假设SQ SLIT-片剂和SQ SCIT疗效相同,成本最小化分析最适合用于比较。根据指南和产品特性摘要,SQ SLIT-片剂的治疗疗程为3年,SQ SCIT为3至5年。不同患者的治疗疗程有所不同,因此,已计算了接受SQ SLIT-片剂或SQ SCIT治疗的HDM呼吸道过敏性疾病(RAD)平均患者的治疗成本。收集了与过敏免疫疗法相关的所有成本,即药物、给药和治疗环境成本,并根据丹麦指南进行了贴现。进行了全面的单因素敏感性分析。结果 HDM RAD平均患者的SQ SLIT-片剂治疗成本为3094欧元,SQ SCIT为3799欧元;然而,在计算中加入间接成本后,SQ SLIT-片剂和SQ SCIT的治疗总成本分别为3697欧元和6717欧元。因此,如果2500名HDM RAD患者用SQ SLIT-片剂而非SQ SCIT治疗,将为医疗系统节省约180万欧元。该结论在敏感性分析的任何变化中都很稳健。结论 就治疗丹麦HDM RAD患者的成本而言,与SQ SCIT相比,用SQ SLIT-片剂治疗患者显然更节省成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验