Poudel Deepesh, Krage Eric Stephen, Brey Richard Ray, Guilmette Raymond A
*Department of Nuclear Engineering & Health Physics, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID; †Lovelace Respiratory Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM and Ray Guilmette and Associates, LLC, Perry, ME.
Health Phys. 2016 Apr;110(4):361-9. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000468.
Despite the presence of a relatively large amount of human data available on the metabolism of plutonium, the experimental animal data is still important in constructing and parameterizing the biokinetic models. Recognizing this importance, the biokinetic data obtained from studies done by P.W. Durbin in nonhuman primates (NHP) were evaluated against the ICRP 67 systemic model and the two human models developed thereafter. The default transfer rates recommended for adult humans in these models predict the urinary excretion in NHP to a certain extent. However, they were unable to describe the fecal excretion rates several days post intake and the activities in skeleton and liver at the time of the death. These inconsistencies between the human reference models and the NHP biokinetic data are the result of metabolic and physiological differences between the species, as demonstrated by early biokinetic studies.
尽管有大量关于钚代谢的人体数据,但实验动物数据在构建生物动力学模型并为其设定参数方面仍然很重要。认识到这一重要性后,将P.W. 德宾在非人类灵长类动物(NHP)研究中获得的生物动力学数据与国际辐射防护委员会(ICRP)67号全身模型以及此后开发的两个人体模型进行了评估。这些模型中为成年人类推荐的默认转移率在一定程度上预测了NHP中的尿排泄情况。然而,它们无法描述摄入后几天的粪便排泄率以及死亡时骨骼和肝脏中的活度。如早期生物动力学研究所表明的,人类参考模型与NHP生物动力学数据之间的这些不一致是物种间代谢和生理差异的结果。