Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死中钙拮抗剂试验的综述。

Review of calcium antagonist trials in acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Roberts R

机构信息

Bugher Foundation Center for Molecular Biology in the Cardiovascular System, Baylor College of Medicine, Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030.

出版信息

Clin Cardiol. 1989 Jul;12(7 Suppl 3):III41-7.

PMID:2691141
Abstract

Nine randomized trials in patients with acute myocardial infarction have been performed to assess the effect of nifedipine on infarct size, reinfarction and/or survival. In none of the trials was there any benefit and in some there was a deleterious effect. In the most recent trial, SPRINT II, the study was stopped prematurely-because of deleterious side effects in the diltiazem-treated group. Thus, nifedipine is not recommended in patients with acute myocardial infarction or postmyocardial infarction for prevention of reinfarction or death, and further trials are not necessary. In a single study involving 1,436 patients, verapamil showed no statistical benefit on reinfarction or survival, but due to a high drop-out rate, the result appears less than definitive. A second trial has been completed but results are not yet available. In a randomized, double-blind short-term (2 weeks) trial consisting of 576 patients with non-Q-wave infarction, diltiazem caused a 50% reduction in the incidence of reinfarction and refractory angina. In a long-term trial (12-52 mos.) consisting of 2,466 patients with Q- and non-Q-infarction, there was no benefit overall, but in the patients without failure (80%) there was a 28% reduction in cardiac events. In the patients with non-Q-infarction (634), there was a 40% reduction in cardiac events, and at the end of 4-5 years there was still a reduction of 34% in the diltiazem group. In patients admitted to the study with failure, the mortality was increased in patients with Q- or non-Q-infarction. Thus, diltiazem is recommended for routine prophylaxis in patients with non-Q-infarction without cardiac failure.

摘要

已经进行了9项针对急性心肌梗死患者的随机试验,以评估硝苯地平对梗死面积、再梗死和/或生存率的影响。在这些试验中,没有一项显示出任何益处,有些试验还出现了有害影响。在最近的SPRINT II试验中,研究因地尔硫䓬治疗组出现有害副作用而提前终止。因此,不建议急性心肌梗死患者或心肌梗死后患者使用硝苯地平预防再梗死或死亡,也无需进一步试验。在一项涉及1436名患者的单一研究中,维拉帕米对再梗死或生存率没有统计学上的益处,但由于高失访率,结果似乎不太明确。第二项试验已经完成,但结果尚未公布。在一项由576名非Q波梗死患者组成的随机、双盲短期(2周)试验中,地尔硫䓬使再梗死和难治性心绞痛的发生率降低了50%。在一项由2466名Q波和非Q波梗死患者组成的长期试验(12 - 52个月)中,总体上没有益处,但在没有心力衰竭的患者(80%)中,心脏事件减少了28%。在非Q波梗死患者(634名)中,心脏事件减少了40%,在4 - 5年结束时,地尔硫䓬组仍有34%的降低。在因心力衰竭入院参加研究的患者中,Q波或非Q波梗死患者的死亡率增加。因此,推荐地尔硫䓬用于无心力衰竭的非Q波梗死患者的常规预防。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验