Vassos Nikolaos, Förtsch Thomas, Aladashvili Archil, Hohenberger Werner, Croner Roland S
Department of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Krankenhausstrasse 12, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
National Cancer Center of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia.
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb 24;14(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0804-x.
Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has become the treatment of choice for resectable peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and improved the survival of these patients. The situation changes if PC recurs and repeated CRS with HIPEC is considered. The patient selection and outcome of the repeated approach has not been well described. We analyzed our cohort and share the experiences.
Ninety-three CRS/HIPEC procedures, performed in 85 patients during the period 2001-2013, were examined in a retrospective analysis. Type of primary, ECOG status, peritoneal cancer index (PCI), completeness of cytoreduction (CC), duration of hospitalization, postoperative morbidity, mortality, and disease-free/overall survival were reviewed.
Six patients (7%) underwent a second CRS/HIPEC (median interval between the two procedures: 26 months, range 8-61) including two patients with mesotheliomas, one patient with ovarian adenocarcinoma, one patient with leiomyosarcoma of uterus, one patient with colon adenocarcinoma, and one patient with appendiceal adenocarcinoma. The last two patients underwent a third CRS/HIPEC, 25 and 36 months, after the second procedure. The median PCI was 14 (range, 4-26) during the first and 20 (range, 7-39) during the second CRS/HIPEC of these patients. Completeness of cytoreduction score of 0 (CC-0) was achieved in all first procedures and in 67% of second procedures (CC-0; n=4 and CC-1; n=2). A CC-0 score was possible in both of the third procedures. The mean operating time was 444 min (range, 198-642) and 427 min (range, 239-617) during the first and the second procedure. Median intensive care unit (ICU) was 2 days, and hospital stay after second CRS/HIPEC was 17 days (range, 7-50). The 30-day morbidity after repeated CRS/HIPEC was 33% (16% for grade III-IV complications), and there was no 30-day mortality neither after the second nor after the third CRS/HIPEC. Median disease-free interval between first CRS/HIPEC and peritoneal recurrence was 17 months (range, 8-30). Median disease-free survival of 18 months (range, 4-33) was achieved after the second CRS/HIPEC. After a median follow-up of 74 months (range, 39-151), all patients are alive with disease (n=5) or disease free (n=1) under chemotherapy.
In experienced centers, repeated CRS/HIPEC can be performed with safety. Patient selection and correct timing is of particular importance in achieving control of the disease. Repeated CRS/HIPEC should be considered as treatment option for selected patients with recurrent PC.
细胞减灭术(CRS)联合腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)已成为可切除性腹膜癌病(PC)的首选治疗方法,并提高了这些患者的生存率。如果PC复发并考虑再次进行CRS联合HIPEC,情况就会发生变化。重复手术的患者选择和结果尚未得到充分描述。我们分析了我们的队列并分享经验。
对2001年至2013年期间85例患者进行的93例CRS/HIPEC手术进行回顾性分析。回顾了原发类型、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)状态、腹膜癌指数(PCI)、细胞减灭的完整性(CC)、住院时间、术后发病率、死亡率以及无病生存期/总生存期。
6例患者(7%)接受了第二次CRS/HIPEC(两次手术之间的中位间隔时间:26个月,范围8 - 61个月),其中包括2例间皮瘤患者、1例卵巢腺癌患者、1例子宫平滑肌肉瘤患者、1例结肠腺癌患者和1例阑尾腺癌患者。最后2例患者在第二次手术后25个月和36个月接受了第三次CRS/HIPEC。这些患者第一次CRS/HIPEC时的中位PCI为14(范围4 - 26),第二次为20(范围7 - 39)。所有第一次手术以及67%的第二次手术(CC - 0;n = 4和CC - 1;n = 2)实现了细胞减灭评分0(CC - 0)。第三次手术均有可能实现CC - 0评分。第一次手术的平均手术时间为444分钟(范围198 - 642分钟),第二次为427分钟(范围239 - 617分钟)。中位重症监护病房(ICU)时间为2天,第二次CRS/HIPEC后的住院时间为17天(范围7 - 50天)。重复CRS/HIPEC后的30天发病率为33%(III - IV级并发症为16%),第二次和第三次CRS/HIPEC后均无30天死亡率。第一次CRS/HIPEC与腹膜复发之间的中位无病间隔时间为17个月(范围8 - 30个月)。第二次CRS/HIPEC后的中位无病生存期为18个月(范围4 - 33个月)。经过中位74个月(范围39 - 151个月)的随访,所有患者在化疗期间均存活,其中5例有疾病,1例无疾病。
在经验丰富的中心,重复进行CRS/HIPEC是安全可行的。患者选择和正确的时机对于控制疾病尤为重要。对于选定的复发性PC患者,应考虑将重复CRS/HIPEC作为一种治疗选择。