Suppr超能文献

心包积液与心包活检的诊断价值:单中心经验

The Diagnostic Value of Pericardial Fluid and Pericardial Biopsy: Single Center Experiences.

作者信息

Yildirim Mehmet, Ustaalioglu Recep, Erkan Murat, Ustaalioglu Bala Basak Oven, Demirbag Hatice, Yasaroglu Murat, Dogusoy Ilgaz, Okay Tamer

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Siyami Ersek Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Pathology, Haydarpasa Numune Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Heart Surg Forum. 2016 Feb 23;19(1):E23-7. doi: 10.1532/hsf.1328.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with recurrent pericardial effusion and pericardial tamponade are usually treated in thoracic surgery clinics by VATS (video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) or open pericardial window operation. The diagnostic importance of pathological evaluation of the pericardial fluid and tissue in the same patients has been reported in few studies. We reviewed pathological examination of the pericardial tissue and fluid specimens and the effect on the clinical treatment in our clinic, and compared the results with the literature.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 174 patients who underwent pericardial window operation due to pericardial tamponade or recurrent pericardial effusion. For all patients both the results of the pericardial fluid and pericardial biopsy specimen were evaluated. Clinicopathological factors were analyzed by using descriptive analysis.

RESULTS

Median age was 61 (range, 20-94 years). The most common benign diagnosis was chronic inflammation (94 patients) by pericardial biopsy. History of malignancy was present in 28 patients (16.1%) and the most common disease was lung cancer (14 patients). A total of 24 patients (13.8%) could be diagnosed as having malignancy by pericardial fluid or pericardial biopsy examination. The malignancy was recognized for 12 patients who had a history of cancer; 9 of 12 with pericardial biopsy, 7 diagnosed by pericardial fluid. Twelve of 156 patients were recognized as having underlying malignancy by pericardial biopsy (n = 9) or fluid examination (n = 10), without known malignancy previously.

CONCLUSION

Recurrent pericardial effusion/pericardial tamponade are entities frequently diagnosed, and surgical interventions may be needed either for diagnosis and/or treatment, but specific etiology can rarely be obtained in spite of pathological examination of either pericardial tissue or fluid. For increasing the probability of a specific diagnosis both the pericardial fluid and the pericardial tissues have to be sent for pathologic examination.

摘要

背景

复发性心包积液和心包填塞患者通常在胸外科门诊接受电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)或开放性心包开窗手术治疗。很少有研究报道同一患者心包液和组织病理评估的诊断重要性。我们回顾了本诊所心包组织和液体标本的病理检查及其对临床治疗的影响,并将结果与文献进行比较。

方法

我们回顾性分析了174例因心包填塞或复发性心包积液接受心包开窗手术的患者。对所有患者的心包液和心包活检标本结果进行评估。采用描述性分析对临床病理因素进行分析。

结果

中位年龄为61岁(范围20 - 94岁)。心包活检最常见的良性诊断为慢性炎症(94例患者)。28例患者(16.1%)有恶性肿瘤病史,最常见的疾病是肺癌(14例患者)。通过心包液或心包活检检查,共有24例患者(13.8%)被诊断为恶性肿瘤。12例有癌症病史的患者被确诊为恶性肿瘤;12例中有9例通过心包活检确诊,7例通过心包液确诊。156例患者中有12例通过心包活检(n = 9)或液体检查(n = 10)被确诊为潜在恶性肿瘤,此前无已知恶性肿瘤病史。

结论

复发性心包积液/心包填塞是经常诊断出的病症,可能需要进行手术干预以进行诊断和/或治疗,但尽管对心包组织或液体进行了病理检查,仍很少能获得具体病因。为了提高明确诊断的概率,心包液和心包组织都必须送检进行病理检查。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验