Wygant Dustin B, Sellbom Martin, Sleep Chelsea E, Wall Tina D, Applegate Kathryn C, Krueger Robert F, Patrick Christopher J
Department of Psychology, Eastern Kentucky University.
Department of Psychology, University of Otago.
Personal Disord. 2016 Jul;7(3):229-239. doi: 10.1037/per0000179. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
For decades, it has been known that the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) diagnosis of Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD) is a nonadequate operationalization of psychopathy (Crego & Widiger, 2015). The DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders provides an opportunity to rectify some of these long held concerns. The current study compared the Section III alternative model's trait-based conception of ASPD with the categorical model from the main diagnostic codes section of DSM-5 in terms of associations with differing models of psychopathy. We also evaluated the validity of the trait-based conception more broadly in relation to measures of antisocial tendencies as well as psychopathy. Participants were 200 male inmates who were administered a battery of self-report and interview-based researcher rating measures of relevant constructs. Analyses showed that Section III ASPD outperformed Section II ASPD in predicting scores on Hare's (2003) Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; r = .88 vs. .59). Additionally, aggregate scores for Section III ASPD performed well in capturing variance in differing ASPD and psychopathy measures. Finally, we found that the Section III ASPD impairment criteria added incrementally to the Section III ASPD traits in predicting PCL-R psychopathy and SCID-II ASPD. (PsycINFO Database Record
几十年来,人们一直知道,《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM)中对反社会人格障碍(ASPD)的诊断并不能充分体现心理变态(Crego & Widiger,2015)。DSM-5人格障碍替代模型提供了一个机会来纠正一些长期存在的问题。本研究比较了DSM-5第三部分替代模型中基于特质的ASPD概念与DSM-5主要诊断编码部分的类别模型在与不同心理变态模型的关联方面的差异。我们还更广泛地评估了基于特质的概念在反社会倾向和心理变态测量方面的有效性。参与者为200名男性囚犯,他们接受了一系列基于自我报告和访谈的研究人员对相关构念的评分测量。分析表明,在预测哈雷(2003)的《心理变态检查表修订版》(PCL-R)得分时,第三部分的ASPD比第二部分的ASPD表现更好(r = 0.88对0.59)。此外,第三部分ASPD的总分在捕捉不同ASPD和心理变态测量的方差方面表现良好。最后,我们发现,在预测PCL-R心理变态和《精神障碍诊断问卷第二版》(SCID-II)的ASPD时,第三部分ASPD的损害标准在第三部分ASPD特质的基础上有增量贡献。(PsycINFO数据库记录