Institute of Social Prevention and Resocialization, Faculty of Applied Social Sciences and Resocialization, University of Warsaw, ul. Podchorążych 20, 00-721 Warsaw, Poland.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 29;20(3):2366. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032366.
The aim of this study was to create a new instrument measuring antisocial preferences based on the Theory of Social Derailment of Czesław Czapów, who indicated the role of antisocial preferences in predicting antisocial behavior. The measures used were the Antisocial Preferences Scale (APS), BPAQ, Mach-IV, and IVE questionnaires. The participants were 718 prisoners. CFA techniques were used to investigate the construct validity of the Antisocial Preferences Scale. Four alternative models of the APS were specified and tested, namely: one-factor, second-order, multi-factor, and bi-factor. CFA analyses revealed that the best-fitting model was the bifactor. This conceptualization contains seven subscales, namely: aggressiveness, lack of guilt or remorse, breaking legal norms, incapacity for mutually intimate relationships, impulsiveness, risk-taking, and egocentrism.
本研究旨在根据 Czesław Czapów 的社会偏离理论创建一种新的测量反社会偏好的工具,该理论指出反社会偏好在预测反社会行为中的作用。所使用的测量方法包括反社会偏好量表(APS)、BPAQ、Mach-IV 和 IVE 问卷。参与者为 718 名囚犯。使用 CFA 技术来研究反社会偏好量表的结构效度。指定并测试了 APS 的四种替代模型,即:单因素、二阶、多因素和双因素。CFA 分析表明,最佳拟合模型是双因素模型。这种概念化包含七个分量表,分别是:攻击性、缺乏内疚或悔恨、违反法律规范、无法建立亲密关系、冲动、冒险和自我中心。