• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

八旬老人膀胱癌的机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术

Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer in Octogenarians.

作者信息

De Groote Ruben, Gandaglia Giorgio, Geurts Nicolas, Goossens Marijn, Pauwels Elisabeth, D'Hondt Frederiek, Gratzke Christian, Fossati Nicola, De Naeyer Geert, Schatteman Peter, Carpentier Paul, Novara Giacomo, Mottrie Alexandre

机构信息

1 Department of Urology, O.L.V. Hospital , Aalst, Belgium .

2 O.L.V. Vattikuti Robotic Surgery Institute , Melle, Belgium .

出版信息

J Endourol. 2016 Jul;30(7):792-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0050. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1089/end.2016.0050
PMID:26914490
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate perioperative morbidity and mortality rate, a 3-year recurrence-free survival, and cancer-specific mortality rate in patients older than 80 years undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data of 155 consecutive patients who received RARC for muscle-invasive or high-risk nonmuscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder between 2003 and 2014 at a high-volume robotic center. Diversion was performed intra- or extracorporeally according to the surgeon's preferences. Complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess the impact of age on postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 155 consecutive patients, 22 (14.2%) patients were 80 years or older. Octogenarians did not significantly differ from younger patients in ASA score (p = 0.4) and Charlson comorbidity index (p = 0.4). Prevalence of any grade and high-grade complications was similar in both groups (all p ≥ 0.6). Older patients had a significantly higher pathologic tumor grade (p = 0.04) and a lower use of pelvic lymphadenectomy (p < 0.001). No perioperative mortality rate was recorded within 90 days from surgery. Elderly patients had a similar risk of 3-year oncologic recurrence after surgery compared with their younger counterparts (odds ratio [OR] 1.63; p = 0.2). Conversely, the risk of cancer-specific mortality rate was significantly higher (OR 2.78; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients 80 years or older undergoing RARC for bladder cancer did not have a higher risk of peri- and postoperative morbidity and mortality rate and had a similar 3-year recurrence-free survival, suggesting that RARC can be safely performed in selected elderly patients by experienced surgeons.

摘要

目的

评估年龄大于80岁的患者接受机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC)后的围手术期发病率和死亡率、3年无复发生存率以及癌症特异性死亡率。

材料与方法

我们回顾性收集了2003年至2014年期间在一家大型机器人手术中心连续接受RARC治疗肌肉浸润性或高危非肌肉浸润性膀胱尿路上皮癌的155例患者的数据。根据外科医生的偏好进行体内或体外尿流改道。并发症根据Clavien-Dindo系统分级。采用逻辑回归分析评估年龄对术后结果的影响。

结果

在155例连续患者中,22例(14.2%)患者年龄在80岁及以上。八旬老人与年轻患者在ASA评分(p = 0.4)和Charlson合并症指数(p = 0.4)方面无显著差异。两组中任何级别和高级别并发症的发生率相似(所有p≥0.6)。老年患者病理肿瘤分级显著更高(p = 0.04),盆腔淋巴结清扫术的使用率更低(p < 0.001)。术后90天内未记录到围手术期死亡率。老年患者术后3年肿瘤复发风险与年轻患者相似(优势比[OR] 1.63;p = 0.2)。相反,癌症特异性死亡率风险显著更高(OR 2.78;p = 0.02)。

结论

80岁及以上的膀胱癌患者接受RARC治疗后围手术期和术后发病率及死亡率风险并不更高,且3年无复发生存率相似,这表明经验丰富的外科医生可以在选定的老年患者中安全地进行RARC。

相似文献

1
Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer in Octogenarians.八旬老人膀胱癌的机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术
J Endourol. 2016 Jul;30(7):792-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0050. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
2
Robot-assisted Versus Open Radical Cystectomy in Patients Receiving Perioperative Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: The Oncologist's Perspective from a Multicentre Study.机器人辅助与开放性根治性膀胱切除术在接受围手术期化疗的肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者中的比较:多中心研究中肿瘤学家的观点。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Dec;4(6):937-945. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.03.011. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
3
Perioperative outcomes and complications of intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a real-life, multi-institutional french study.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后膀胱癌患者行体腔内与体腔外尿流改道术的围手术期结局和并发症:一项真实世界、多机构的法国研究。
World J Urol. 2018 Nov;36(11):1711-1718. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2313-8. Epub 2018 May 9.
4
Oncological Outcomes in Patients Treated with Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Comparison Between Open, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Approaches.接受根治性膀胱切除术治疗的膀胱癌患者的肿瘤学结局:开放手术、腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助手术方法的比较。
J Endourol. 2016 Jul;30(7):783-91. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0652. Epub 2016 May 26.
5
Recurrence patterns after open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.膀胱癌开放及机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的复发模式。
Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
6
Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术与开放性根治性膀胱切除术的比较疗效
Urol Oncol. 2018 Mar;36(3):88.e1-88.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
7
Randomized Trial Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: Oncologic Outcomes.随机对照试验比较开放性根治性膀胱切除术和机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术:肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):465-471. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.04.030. Epub 2018 May 18.
8
Oncologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Results of a High-Volume Robotic Center.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学结果:高容量机器人手术中心的结果
J Endourol. 2016 Jan;30(1):75-82. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0482. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
9
Oncologic Outcomes and Predictive Factors for Recurrence Following Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for Urothelial Carcinoma: Multicenter Study from Korea.韩国多中心研究:机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗尿路上皮癌的肿瘤学结果和复发预测因素。
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Oct;32(10):1662-1668. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.10.1662.
10
Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤学和功能结局的系统评价和累积分析。
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):402-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.008. Epub 2015 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
A meta-analytic appraisal of robotic-assisted cystectomy outcomes in the elderly octogenarian population.对老年八旬老人群体中机器人辅助膀胱切除术结果的荟萃分析评估。
J Robot Surg. 2025 May 24;19(1):232. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02379-1.
2
Radical cystectomy mortality in older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年患者根治性膀胱切除术的死亡率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJU Int. 2025 Jul;136(1):19-31. doi: 10.1111/bju.16733. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
3
Comparing surgical site wound infection after laparoscopic and open radical cystectomies in patients with bladder cancer.
比较腹腔镜和开放性根治性膀胱切除术治疗膀胱癌患者的手术部位伤口感染。
Int Wound J. 2024 Apr;21(4):e14718. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14718.
4
Safety and feasibility of robotic surgery for old rectal cancer patients.机器人手术治疗老年直肠癌患者的安全性和可行性。
Updates Surg. 2023 Aug;75(5):1161-1169. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01504-9. Epub 2023 May 26.
5
Long-term oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: update series from a high-volume robotic center beyond 10 years of follow-up.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的长期肿瘤学结果:10 年以上随访的大容量机器人中心的最新系列。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):1143-1150. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01473-y. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
6
A propensity score matching study on robot-assisted radical cystectomy for older patients: comparison of intracorporeal ileal conduit and cutaneous ureterostomy.一项关于机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术治疗老年患者的倾向评分匹配研究:比较腔内回肠导管和皮肤造口术。
BMC Urol. 2022 Nov 7;22(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01123-3.
7
Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Disease in Octogenarians and Above: Analysis of 78 Patients.八十岁及以上老年人转移性脊柱疾病的手术治疗:78例患者分析
Global Spine J. 2023 Jul;13(6):1481-1489. doi: 10.1177/21925682211037936. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
8
A comparative study of perioperative and survival outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy in patients over 80 and under 80 years old.80 岁以上与 80 岁以下患者行机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术的围手术期和生存结局的对比研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jul 6;19(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02312-4.
9
Radical cystectomy and perioperative chemotherapy in octogenarians with bladder cancer.老年膀胱癌患者的根治性膀胱切除术及围手术期化疗
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Sep;15(9):E465-E470. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6907.
10
Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis, cumulative analysis, and systematic review.机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术后的体内与体外尿流改道术:荟萃分析、累积分析和系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Jun;15(3):321-333. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01174-4. Epub 2020 Nov 22.