• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The benefits of appraisal: a critical (re)view of the literature.

作者信息

Scallan Samantha, Locke Rachel, Eksteen Diana, Caesar Susi

机构信息

a GP Education Unit , University Hospitals Southampton , Southampton , UK.

b Faculty of Education, Health and Social Care , University of Winchester , Winchester , UK.

出版信息

Educ Prim Care. 2016 Mar;27(2):94-7. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2016.1142772. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1080/14739879.2016.1142772
PMID:26915657
Abstract

It has been acknowledged that little is known about the impact of general practice (GP) appraisal on clinical and professional practice, as may be demonstrated by identifiable or 'hard' outcomes, and further, that the way in which appraisal informs professional development is unclear. In spite of this acknowledgement and the existence of a substantial number of studies about GP appraisal, to date an overview of the field of enquiry which maps what is known, has been lacking. In this leading article we present the first extensive thematic narrative synthesis of the literature on appraisal. In it we highlight the issues and tensions around research into appraisal, based on what we found (or didn't find) in our review. Key conclusions concern the focus of existing research - which has tended to report the perceptions of change from individual appraisees, rather than specific examples of change captured from other sources and perspectives - and the scope of research - which has been limited to certain data collection methods. Based upon our review, we draw out implications for research and researchers in the future.

摘要

相似文献

1
The benefits of appraisal: a critical (re)view of the literature.
Educ Prim Care. 2016 Mar;27(2):94-7. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2016.1142772. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
2
The implications of enhancing appraisal to meet the requirements of revalidation, as perceived by appraisers: a qualitative study in Scotland.评估者所认为的强化评估以满足再认证要求的影响:苏格兰的一项定性研究
Educ Prim Care. 2011 Nov;22(6):377-85. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2011.11494040.
3
Benefits of appraisal as perceived by general practitioners.全科医生所认为的评估的益处。
Educ Prim Care. 2011 Nov;22(6):393-8. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2011.11494042.
4
Annual trainer peer-review: impact on educational practice and sense of community.年度培训师同行评审:对教育实践和社区感的影响。
Educ Prim Care. 2016 Mar;27(2):114-20. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2016.1147136. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
5
Impact of revalidation on appraisal in primary care: an initial evaluation of the experience of Welsh GPs.重新认证对基层医疗评估的影响:威尔士全科医生经验的初步评估。
Educ Prim Care. 2016 Mar;27(2):121-8. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2016.1149957.
6
Strengthening medical appraisal: reactions to proposals for a new appraisal system to support revalidation.
Educ Prim Care. 2011 Nov;22(6):409-14. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2011.11494044.
7
Interpreting multisource feedback: online study of consensus and variation among GP appraisers.解读多源反馈:全科医生评估者之间共识与差异的在线研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Apr;66(645):e277-84. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X684373. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
8
GP appraisal: an evaluation of generational differences on the utility of GP appraisal.GP 评估:对不同代际医生对 GP 评估实用性的评估。
Educ Prim Care. 2020 Nov;31(6):371-376. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2020.1812438. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
9
The benefits of appraisal.评估的益处。
Educ Prim Care. 2012 Sep;23(5):369-70. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2012.11494143.
10
Does appraisal enhance learning, improve practice and encourage continuing professional development? A survey of general practitioners' experiences of appraisal.评估能否促进学习、改善实践并鼓励持续专业发展?一项关于全科医生评估经历的调查。
Qual Prim Care. 2009;17(6):387-95.

引用本文的文献

1
'I brought that up in my appraisal ... and my consultant said no.' Structure and agency in specialty and associate specialist (SAS) doctors' experiences of appraisal.“我在考核中提到了这一点……而我的顾问说不行。”专科医生和副专科医生(SAS)考核经历中的结构与能动性
Clin Med (Lond). 2021 May;21(3):e252-e256. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0976.