Ben-Ur Z, Matalon S, Aviv I, Cardash H S
Section of Oral Rehabilitation, Tel Aviv University, Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Israel.
J Prosthet Dent. 1989 Nov;62(5):557-62. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90079-6.
Rigidity tests were performed on maxillary major connectors of different designs and mandibular major connectors of the lingual bar-type with different cross-sectional shapes and thicknesses. Each major connector was clamped on one side while the other side was subjected to bending, torsion, and bending under torsion forces. Deformation was measured with a micrometer microscope. The most rigid maxillary major connector was the design incorporating the anterior-posterior palatal bar. The most flexible was the U-shaped palatal bar. The full pear-shaped lingual bar (4 x 4 mm) was the most rigid of the major connectors. Among the more conventional lingual bars, the semielliptical bar (3.75 X 1.75 mm) was the most rigid, and the narrow semielliptical bar (4 x 1.5 mm) was the most flexible.
对不同设计的上颌主连接体以及不同横截面形状和厚度的舌杆型下颌主连接体进行了刚性测试。每个主连接体一侧被夹紧,另一侧承受弯曲、扭转以及扭转下的弯曲力。用测微显微镜测量变形情况。最刚性的上颌主连接体是包含前后腭杆的设计。最灵活的是U形腭杆。全梨形舌杆(4×4毫米)是主连接体中最刚性的。在更传统的舌杆中,半椭圆形杆(3.75×1.75毫米)最刚性,窄半椭圆形杆(4×1.5毫米)最灵活。