Selby Michael S, Simpson Scott W, Lovejoy C Owen
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Georgia Campus-Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Suwanee, Georgia.
Department of Anatomy, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2016 May;299(5):583-600. doi: 10.1002/ar.23333. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
Previously, we described several features of the carpometacarpal joints in extant large-bodied apes that are likely adaptations to the functional demands of vertical climbing and suspension. We observed that all hominids, including modern humans and the 4.4-million-year-old hominid Ardipithecus ramidus, lacked these features. Here, we assess the uniqueness of these features in a large sample of monkey, ape, and human hands. These new data provide additional insights into the functional adaptations and evolution of the anthropoid hand. Our survey highlights a series of anatomical adaptations that restrict motion between the second and third metacarpals (MC2 and MC3) and their associated carpals in extant apes, achieved via joint reorganization and novel energy dissipation mechanisms. Their hamate-MC4 and -MC5 joint surface morphologies suggest limited mobility, at least in Pan. Gibbons and spider monkeys have several characters (angled MC3, complex capitate-MC3 joint topography, variably present capitate-MC3 ligaments) that suggest functional convergence in response to suspensory locomotion. Baboons have carpometacarpal morphology suggesting flexion/extension at these joints beyond that observed in most other Old World monkeys, probably as an energy dissipating mechanism minimizing collision forces during terrestrial locomotion. All hominids lack these specializations of the extant great apes, suggesting that vertical climbing was never a central feature of our ancestral locomotor repertoire. Furthermore, the reinforced carpometacarpus of vertically climbing African apes was likely appropriated for knuckle-walking in concert with other novel potential energy dissipating mechanisms. The most parsimonious explanation of the structural similarity of these carpometacarpal specializations in great apes is that they evolved independently.
此前,我们描述了现存大型猿类掌指关节的几个特征,这些特征可能是对垂直攀爬和悬吊功能需求的适应。我们观察到,所有灵长类动物,包括现代人类和440万年前的灵长类动物拉密达地猿,都缺乏这些特征。在这里,我们在大量猴子、猿类和人类手部样本中评估这些特征的独特性。这些新数据为类人猿手部的功能适应和进化提供了更多见解。我们的调查突出了一系列解剖学适应特征,这些特征通过关节重组和新的能量消散机制,限制了现存猿类第二和第三掌骨(MC2和MC3)及其相关腕骨之间的运动。它们的钩骨-MC4和-MC5关节表面形态表明活动受限,至少在黑猩猩中是这样。长臂猿和蜘蛛猴有几个特征(MC3呈角状、头状骨-MC3关节地形复杂、头状骨-MC3韧带存在差异),表明它们对悬吊运动有功能趋同现象。狒狒的掌指关节形态表明,这些关节的屈伸程度超过了大多数其他旧世界猴,这可能是一种能量消散机制,可在陆地运动时将碰撞力降至最低。所有灵长类动物都缺乏现存大型猿类的这些特化特征,这表明垂直攀爬从未是我们祖先运动方式的核心特征。此外,垂直攀爬的非洲猿类强化的掌骨可能与其他新的潜在能量消散机制一起被用于指关节行走。对大型猿类这些掌指关节特化结构相似性的最简洁解释是它们是独立进化的。