Webster Lynn, Gruener Daniel, Kirby Todd, Xiang Qinfang, Tzanis Evan, Finn Andrew
*PRA Health Sciences, Salt Lake City, Utah
St. Louis Clinical Trials, a Subsidiary of Evolution Research Group.
Pain Med. 2016 May;17(5):899-907. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnv110. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
Assess whether patients with chronic pain receiving 80 to 220 mg oral morphine sulfate equivalent of a full Μ: -opioid agonist could be transitioned to buccal buprenorphine at approximately 50% of their full dose without inducing opioid withdrawal or sacrificing analgesic efficacy.
A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, two-period crossover study in adult patients receiving around-the-clock full opioid agonist therapy and confirmed to be opioid dependent by naloxone challenge. Study doses were substituted at the time of the regular dose schedule for each patient. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a maximum Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale score ≥ 13 (moderate withdrawal) or use of rescue medication.
35 subjects on ≥ 80 mg morphine sulfate equivalent per day were evaluable for opioid withdrawal. One patient during buccal buprenorphine treatment and two during 50% full Μ: -opioid agonist treatment experienced opioid withdrawal of at least moderate intensity. The mean maximum Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale scores were similar, and numerically lower on buccal buprenorphine. There were no significant differences in pain ratings between treatments. The most frequent adverse events with buccal buprenorphine were headache (19%), vomiting (13%), nausea, diarrhea, and drug withdrawal syndrome (each 9%), and with full Μ: -opioid agonist were headache (16%), drug withdrawal syndrome (13%), and nausea (6%).
Chronic pain patients treated with around-the-clock full Μ: -opioid agonist therapy can be switched to buccal buprenorphine (a partial Μ: -opioid agonist) at approximately 50% of the full Μ: -opioid agonist dose without an increased risk of opioid withdrawal or loss of pain control.
评估接受80至220毫克口服硫酸吗啡等效剂量的全μ阿片受体激动剂治疗的慢性疼痛患者,能否转换为大约相当于其全剂量50%的颊含丁丙诺啡,而不引发阿片类药物戒断反应或牺牲镇痛效果。
一项随机、双盲、双模拟、活性对照、两阶段交叉研究,纳入接受全天候全阿片受体激动剂治疗且经纳洛酮激发试验确诊为阿片类药物依赖的成年患者。在每位患者的常规给药时间替换研究药物剂量。主要终点是临床阿片戒断量表评分≥13(中度戒断)或使用解救药物的患者比例。
35名每天服用≥80毫克硫酸吗啡等效剂量的受试者可评估阿片戒断情况。1名患者在颊含丁丙诺啡治疗期间,2名患者在50%全μ阿片受体激动剂治疗期间经历了至少中度强度的阿片戒断反应。临床阿片戒断量表的平均最高评分相似,颊含丁丙诺啡时在数值上更低。各治疗组之间的疼痛评分无显著差异。颊含丁丙诺啡最常见的不良事件是头痛(19%)、呕吐(13%)、恶心、腹泻和药物戒断综合征(各9%),全μ阿片受体激动剂组为头痛(16%)、药物戒断综合征(13%)和恶心(6%)。
接受全天候全μ阿片受体激动剂治疗的慢性疼痛患者,可转换为大约相当于全μ阿片受体激动剂剂量50%的颊含丁丙诺啡(一种部分μ阿片受体激动剂),而不会增加阿片类药物戒断风险或失去疼痛控制效果。