Sinha Maruti, Gupta Ridhima, Gupta Pushpender, Rani Rekha, Kaur Ramanjeet, Singh Rahil
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kasturba Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West Virginia University - Charleston Division, Charleston, West Virginia, USA.
Indian J Community Med. 2016 Jan-Mar;41(1):45-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.170966.
To identify the obstetric risk factors, incidence, and causes of uterine rupture, management modalities, and the associated maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality in one of the largest tertiary level women care hospital in Delhi.
A 7-year retrospective analysis of 47 cases of uterine rupture was done. The charts of these patients were analyzed and the data regarding demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, risk factors, management, operative findings, maternal and fetal outcomes, and postoperative complications was studied.
The incidence of rupture was one in 1,633 deliveries (0.061%). The vast majority of patients had prior low transverse cesarean section (84.8%). The clinical presentation of the patients with rupture of the unscarred uterus was more dramatic with extensive tears compared to rupture with scarred uterus. The estimated blood loss ranged from 1,200 to 1,500 cc. Hemoperitoneum was identified in 95.7% of the patient and 83% of the patient underwent repair of rent with or without simultaneous tubal ligation. Subtotal hysterectomy was performed in five cases. There were no maternal deaths in our series. However, there were 32 cases of intrauterine fetal demise and five cases of stillbirths.
Uterine rupture is a major contributor to maternal morbidity and neonatal mortality. Four major easily identifiable risk factors including history of prior cesarean section, grand multiparity, obstructed labor, and fetal malpresentations constitute 90% of cases of uterine rupture. Identification of these high risk women, prompt diagnosis, immediate transfer, and optimal management needs to be overemphasized to avoid adverse fetomaternal complications.
在德里最大的三级妇女保健医院之一,确定子宫破裂的产科危险因素、发生率、原因、处理方式以及相关的孕产妇和围产儿发病率及死亡率。
对47例子宫破裂病例进行了为期7年的回顾性分析。分析了这些患者的病历,并研究了有关人口统计学特征、临床表现、危险因素、处理、手术发现、孕产妇和胎儿结局以及术后并发症的数据。
破裂发生率为1/1633例分娩(0.061%)。绝大多数患者既往有低位横切口剖宫产史(84.8%)。与瘢痕子宫破裂相比,未瘢痕化子宫破裂患者的临床表现更剧烈,撕裂范围更广。估计失血量在1200至1500毫升之间。95.7%的患者发现有腹腔积血,83%的患者进行了裂口修补,同时或不同时进行输卵管结扎。5例患者行次全子宫切除术。我们的系列病例中无孕产妇死亡。然而,有32例宫内胎儿死亡和5例死产。
子宫破裂是孕产妇发病和新生儿死亡的主要原因。四个主要的易于识别的危险因素,包括既往剖宫产史、多产、梗阻性分娩和胎位异常,占子宫破裂病例的90%。必须高度重视识别这些高危妇女、及时诊断、立即转诊和优化处理,以避免不良的母胎并发症。