Stapp Jared R, Lilieholm Robert J, Leahy Jessica, Upadhaya Suraj
Ecology and Environmental Sciences Program, University of Maine, 223 Nutting Hall, Orono, ME, 04469, USA.
Environmental Science, Policy, and Management Program, University of California, Berkeley, 326 Mulford Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Environ Manage. 2016 Jun;57(6):1292-303. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0682-6. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
Deforestation in Nepal threatens the functioning of complex social-ecological systems, including rural populations that depend on forests for subsistence, as well as Nepal's biodiversity and other ecosystem services. Nepal's forests are particularly important to the nation's poorest inhabitants, as many depend upon them for daily survival. Two-thirds of Nepal's population relies on forests for sustenance, and these pressures are likely to increase in the future. This, coupled with high population densities and growth rates, highlights the importance of studying the relationship between human communities, forest cover trends through time, and forest management institutions. Here, we used surveys to explore how household attitudes associated with conservation-related behaviors in two rural communities-one that has experienced significant forest loss, and the other forest gain-compare with forest cover trends as indicated by satellite-derived forest-loss and -regeneration estimates between 2005 and 2013. Results found a significant difference in attitudes in the two areas, perhaps contributing to and reacting from current forest conditions. In both study sites, participation in community forestry strengthened support for conservation, forest conservation-related attitudes aligned with forest cover trends, and a negative relationship was found between economic status and having supportive forest conservation-related attitudes. In addition, on average, respondents were not satisfied with their district forest officers and did not feel that the current political climate in Nepal supported sustainable forestry. These findings are important as Nepal's Master Plan for the Forestry Sector has expired and the country is in the process of structuring a new Forestry Sector Strategy.
尼泊尔的森林砍伐威胁着复杂社会生态系统的运转,其中包括依赖森林维持生计的农村人口,以及尼泊尔的生物多样性和其他生态系统服务。尼泊尔的森林对该国最贫困居民尤为重要,因为许多人依靠森林维持日常生存。尼泊尔三分之二的人口依靠森林维持生计,而且这些压力在未来可能会增加。这一点,再加上高人口密度和增长率,凸显了研究人类社区、森林覆盖随时间的变化趋势以及森林管理机构之间关系的重要性。在此,我们通过调查来探究两个农村社区中与保护相关行为有关的家庭态度——其中一个社区经历了显著的森林流失,另一个社区森林面积增加——与2005年至2013年卫星得出的森林流失和再生估计数所显示的森林覆盖趋势相比情况如何。结果发现这两个地区的态度存在显著差异,这可能是当前森林状况的成因并受其影响。在两个研究地点,参与社区林业都增强了对保护的支持,与森林保护相关的态度与森林覆盖趋势一致,并且发现经济状况与拥有支持森林保护的相关态度之间存在负相关关系。此外,平均而言,受访者对其所在地区的林业官员不满意,并且感觉尼泊尔当前的政治氛围不支持可持续林业。这些发现很重要,因为尼泊尔林业部门总体规划已经到期,该国正在制定新的林业部门战略。