Tran Christopher, Bennell Maria C, Qiu Feng, Ko Dennis T, Singh Sheldon M, Dorian Paul, Atzema Clare L, Bhatia R Sacha, Wijeysundera Harindra C
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Schulich Heart Centre, Division of Cardiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Am Heart J. 2016 Mar;173:161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.10.025. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
There is substantial variation in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the emergency department (ED), particularly whether these patients are admitted to hospital. We sought to identify factors that predict admission and to examine the relationship between AF admission and outcomes.
We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients ≥20 years of age who had an index ED visit with a primary diagnosis of AF from between April 1, 2005, and March 31, 2010, in Ontario, Canada. We excluded patients who died during the index ED visit or hospitalization. A hierarchical logistic regression model was used to determine predictors of hospital admission during the index ED visit. A propensity-matched analysis was used to test for associations between hospital admission and 1-year outcomes.
The cohort consisted of 33,699 patients, of whom 16,270 (48.3%) were admitted to hospital. Substantial variation was seen across the 154 hospitals, with admission rates ranging from 3.0% to 91.0%. Admitted patients had higher rates of comorbidities compared to discharged patients. Mortality rates at 1 year were significantly higher in matched admitted versus discharged patients (hazard ratio 1.45, 95% CI 1.33-1.57, P < .001), as were all-cause hospitalizations (hazard ratio 1.18, 95% CI 1.13-1.22, P < .001).
Wide practice variation was observed between hospitals in terms of the proportion of patients admitted. Our data suggest that selected patients when discharged have similar or improved outcomes compared to those who are initially admitted. Future research is needed to better standardize admission/discharge decisions for AF patients in the ED.
急诊科(ED)对心房颤动(AF)的处理存在很大差异,尤其是这些患者是否住院。我们试图确定预测住院的因素,并研究房颤住院与预后之间的关系。
我们对2005年4月1日至2010年3月31日在加拿大安大略省因首次急诊科就诊而被初步诊断为房颤的20岁及以上患者进行了回顾性队列分析。我们排除了在首次急诊科就诊或住院期间死亡的患者。采用分层逻辑回归模型确定首次急诊科就诊时住院的预测因素。倾向匹配分析用于检验住院与1年预后之间的关联。
该队列包括33699名患者,其中16270名(48.3%)住院。在154家医院中观察到了很大差异,住院率从3.0%到91.0%不等。与出院患者相比,住院患者的合并症发生率更高。匹配的住院患者与出院患者相比,1年死亡率显著更高(风险比1.45,95%可信区间1.33 - 1.57,P <.001),全因住院率也是如此(风险比1.18,95%可信区间1.13 - 1.22,P <.001)。
各医院在患者住院比例方面存在广泛的实践差异。我们的数据表明,与最初住院的患者相比,部分出院患者的预后相似或有所改善。未来需要进行研究,以更好地规范急诊科房颤患者的住院/出院决策。