Hunley Samuel B, Hahn Erin R
Department of Psychology, Furman University, Greenville, SC 29613, USA.
Department of Psychology, Furman University, Greenville, SC 29613, USA.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Nov;151:40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
Scale errors offer a unique context in which to examine the interdependencies between language and action. Here, we manipulated the presence of labels in a tool-based paradigm previously shown to elicit high rates of scale errors. We predicted that labels would increase children's scale errors with tools by directing attention to shape, function, and category membership. Children between the ages of 2 and 3years were introduced to an apparatus and shown how to produce its function using a tool (e.g., scooping a toy fish from an aquarium using a net). In each of two test trials, children were asked to choose between two novel tools to complete the same task: one that was a large non-functional version of the tool presented in training and one novel functional object (different in shape). A total of four tool-apparatus sets were tested. The results indicated that without labels, scale errors decreased over the two test trials. In contrast, when labels were present, scale errors remained high in the second test trial. We interpret these findings as evidence that linguistic cues can influence children's action-based errors with tools.
比例误差提供了一个独特的情境,可用于研究语言与行动之间的相互依存关系。在此,我们在一个基于工具的范式中操纵标签的呈现情况,该范式先前已被证明会引发较高比例的比例误差。我们预测,标签会通过引导对形状、功能和类别归属的关注,增加儿童在使用工具时的比例误差。向2至3岁的儿童介绍一种仪器,并展示如何使用工具实现其功能(例如,用网从水族箱中捞出一条玩具鱼)。在两次测试试验的每一次中,要求儿童在两种新工具之间进行选择,以完成相同的任务:一种是训练中呈现的工具的大型无功能版本,另一种是新的功能性物体(形状不同)。总共测试了四套工具-仪器组合。结果表明,没有标签时,比例误差在两次测试试验中有所下降。相比之下,当有标签时,在第二次测试试验中比例误差仍然很高。我们将这些发现解释为语言线索会影响儿童在使用工具时基于行动的误差的证据。