Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
J Urol. 2016 Apr;195(4 Pt 2):1215-20. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.066. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
Current outcome tools for hypospadias have limited focus on the caregiver or patient perspective of important patient centered outcomes. In this study we collaborated with patients, caregivers, and lay and medical experts to develop and pilot a patient reported outcome measure for hypospadias.
We developed a patient reported outcome measure based on systematic review of the literature and focus group input. The patient reported outcome measure was piloted in caregivers for boys younger than 8 years and in patients older than 8 years who presented for urology consultation before meeting with the surgeon. Patients were classified with uncorrected hypospadias, successful repair or failed repair based on the presence or absence of complications (fistula, diverticulum, meatal stenosis/stricture, greater than 30-degree recurrent curvature, glans dehiscence and/or skin reoperation).
A patient reported outcome measure was developed and administered to 347 patients and/or caregivers-proxies, including 105 uncorrected cases, 162 successful repair cases and 80 failed cases. Satisfaction with appearance was highest in those with successful hypospadias repair compared to failed repair and uncorrected hypospadias (93% vs 77% and 67%, respectively). Voiding symptoms such as spraying or a deviated stream were highest in failed and uncorrected cases (39% and 37%, respectively). Overall dissatisfaction with voiding was highest for uncorrected hypospadias and failed repair compared to successful cases (54% and 47%, respectively, vs 15%).
The evaluation of patient and caregiver-proxy reported outcomes in preoperative and postoperative patients with hypospadias allows for the quantification of benefits derived from hypospadias repair and may ultimately represent the gold standard outcome measure for hypospadias. This pilot study identified preliminary patient centered themes and demonstrated the feasibility of administering hypospadias patient reported outcome measures in clinical practice.
目前用于尿道下裂的结局工具对重要的以患者为中心的结局,仅关注照顾者或患者的观点。在这项研究中,我们与患者、照顾者以及非医学专业人士和医学专家合作,开发并初步测试了一种尿道下裂患者报告结局测量工具。
我们基于文献系统回顾和焦点小组的输入开发了一种患者报告结局测量工具。该患者报告结局测量工具在 8 岁以下男孩的照顾者中以及在接受泌尿科会诊但尚未与外科医生会面的 8 岁以上患者中进行了初步测试。根据是否存在并发症(瘘管、憩室、尿道口狭窄/狭窄、大于 30 度的复发性弯曲、龟头裂开和/或皮肤再次手术),将患者分为未矫正尿道下裂、成功修复和修复失败。
共对 347 名患者和/或照顾者-代理人进行了患者报告结局测量工具的开发和评估,其中包括 105 例未矫正病例、162 例成功修复病例和 80 例修复失败病例。与修复失败和未矫正的尿道下裂相比,成功修复的尿道下裂患者对外观的满意度最高(分别为 93%、77%和 67%)。排尿症状(如喷溅或尿流偏离)在修复失败和未矫正的病例中最高(分别为 39%和 37%)。与成功病例相比,未矫正的尿道下裂和修复失败的患者对排尿的总体不满意率最高(分别为 54%和 47%,而成功病例为 15%)。
对术前和术后尿道下裂患者和照顾者报告结局的评估,可量化尿道下裂修复的获益,并可能最终成为尿道下裂的金标准结局测量工具。这项初步研究确定了以患者为中心的主题,并证明了在临床实践中管理尿道下裂患者报告结局测量工具的可行性。