Lei Yunxiao, Wang Honghong, Xiao Xueling, Chen Jia, Li Xianhong
Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China.
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Feb;50(2):148-52. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2016.02.009.
To explore the relationship between use of rush poppers and HIV infection, and associated factors among men who have sex with men in Changsha.
A cross-sectional study was conducted in Changsha from April to December, 2014. Men who have sex with men who came for HIV counseling and testing services were invited to fill out a survey. A total of 608 MSM were finally recruited. The survey included socio-demographic characteristics, sexual roles, sexual behaviors in last 6 months and rush poppers use, HIV infection among MSM. After finishing the questionnaire, 5 ml blood was also drawn for HIV testing. Chi-square test or Fisher probabilities was used to compare usage of rush poppers and HIV antibody positive rate among MSM who had different characteristics and sexual behaviors. Multi-factor unconditioned logistic regression model was used to explore related factors about rush poppers use and HIV infection of MSM.
Among 608 MSM, 29.8% (181) said they ever used rush poppers, and 13.3% (81 cases) were HIV positive. Among MSM who ever used rush poppers, 18.8% (34/181) were HIV positive; While among those who never used rush poppers, 10.5% (45/427) were HIV positive (χ(2)=7.65,P=0.006). Compared with MSM who had no For One Night sex in the last 6 months,OR (95% CI) value of MSM who had 6-10 times For One Night sexes in last 6 months to use rush poppers was 4.32 (1.77-10.57). Compared with MSM who self-identified as top,OR (95% CI) value of MSM who self-identified as bottom or versatile using rush poppers were 2.99 (1.53-5.86), or 3.60 (2.13-6.09). Compared with MSM who self-identified as top, OR (95% CI) value of MSM who self-identified as bottom or versatile to infect HIV were 3.19 (1.35-7.58), or 2.33 (1.12-4.85). Compared with MSM who used condoms at every anal sex,OR (95% CI) value of MSM who used condoms sometimes or never used to infect HIV were 1.93 (1.12-3.35) or 1.87 (0.64-5.50). Compared with MSM who never used rush poppers,OR (95% CI) value of MSM who ever used rush poppers to infect HIV was 1.88 (1.12-3.16).
A large percentage of MSM population in Changsha used rush poppers, and HIV antibody positive rate among MSM was high. MSM who had more frequencies of For One Night sexes, self-identified as bottom or versatile were more likely to use rush poppers and more susceptible to HIV infection. In addition, MSM who had low frequency of condom use in the last 6 months in anal intercourse were more likely to infect HIV.
探讨长沙市男男性行为者中速效吸入剂的使用与HIV感染之间的关系及相关因素。
2014年4月至12月在长沙市进行一项横断面研究。邀请前来接受HIV咨询检测服务的男男性行为者填写调查问卷。最终共招募608名男男性行为者。调查内容包括社会人口学特征、性角色、近6个月的性行为及速效吸入剂使用情况、男男性行为者中的HIV感染情况。完成问卷调查后,同时抽取5ml血液进行HIV检测。采用卡方检验或Fisher确切概率法比较不同特征及性行为的男男性行为者中速效吸入剂的使用情况与HIV抗体阳性率。采用多因素非条件logistic回归模型探讨男男性行为者速效吸入剂使用及HIV感染的相关因素。
608名男男性行为者中,29.8%(181人)表示曾使用过速效吸入剂,13.3%(81例)HIV阳性。在曾使用过速效吸入剂的男男性行为者中,18.8%(34/181)HIV阳性;而在从未使用过速效吸入剂的男男性行为者中,10.5%(45/427)HIV阳性(χ(2)=7.65,P=0.006)。与近6个月无一夜情的男男性行为者相比,近6个月有6 - 10次一夜情的男男性行为者使用速效吸入剂的OR(95%CI)值为4.32(1.77 - 10.57)。与自我认定为主动方的男男性行为者相比,自我认定为被动方或兼性的男男性行为者使用速效吸入剂的OR(95%CI)值为2.99(1.53 - 5.86),或3.60(2.13 - 6.09)。与自我认定为主动方的男男性行为者相比,自我认定为被动方或兼性的男男性行为者感染HIV的OR(95%CI)值为3.19(1.35 - 7.58),或2.33(1.12 - 4.85)。与每次肛交都使用避孕套的男男性行为者相比,有时使用避孕套或从不使用避孕套的男男性行为者感染HIV的OR(95%CI)值为1.93(1.12 - 3.35)或1.87(0.64 - 5.50)。与从未使用过速效吸入剂的男男性行为者相比,曾使用过速效吸入剂的男男性行为者感染HIV的OR(95%CI)值为1.88(1.12 - 3.16)。
长沙市很大比例的男男性行为者使用过速效吸入剂,男男性行为者中HIV抗体阳性率较高。一夜情次数较多、自我认定为被动方或兼性的男男性行为者更易使用速效吸入剂且更易感染HIV。此外,近6个月肛交时避孕套使用频率低的男男性行为者更易感染HIV。