• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有效但昂贵:如何应对评估肝病改善健康技术中的困难权衡。

Effective but costly: How to tackle difficult trade-offs in evaluating health improving technologies in liver diseases.

机构信息

Research Center on Public Health, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.

Section of Digestive Diseases, International Center for Digestive Health, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2016 Oct;64(4):1331-42. doi: 10.1002/hep.28527. Epub 2016 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1002/hep.28527
PMID:26926906
Abstract

UNLABELLED

In the current context of rising health care costs and decreasing sustainability, it is becoming increasingly common to resort to decision analytical modeling and health economics evaluations. Decision analytic models are analytical tools that help decision makers to select the best choice between alternative health care interventions, taking into consideration the complexity of the disease, the socioeconomic context, and the relevant differences in outcomes. We present a brief overview of the use of decision analytical models in health economic evaluations and their applications in the area of liver diseases. The aim is to provide the reader with the basic elements to evaluate health economic analysis reports and to discuss some limitations of the current approaches, as highlighted by the case of the therapy of chronic hepatitis C. To serve its purpose, health economics evaluations must be able to do justice to medical innovation and the market while protecting patients and society and promoting fair access to treatment and its economic sustainability.

CONCLUSION

New approaches and methods able to include variables such as prevalence of the disease, budget impact, and sustainability into the cost-effectiveness analysis are needed to reach this goal. (Hepatology 2016;64:1331-1342).

摘要

目的

在医疗成本不断上升和可持续性不断下降的当前背景下,越来越多地采用决策分析模型和健康经济学评价。决策分析模型是一种分析工具,可帮助决策者在考虑疾病的复杂性、社会经济背景以及相关结果差异的情况下,在各种医疗保健干预措施之间进行选择。

方法

我们简要概述了决策分析模型在健康经济学评价中的应用及其在肝脏疾病领域的应用。目的是为读者提供评估健康经济学分析报告的基本要素,并讨论当前方法的一些局限性,例如慢性丙型肝炎治疗的案例。

结论

需要新的方法和模型,以便将疾病的流行程度、预算影响和可持续性等变量纳入成本效益分析中,以实现这一目标。

相似文献

1
Effective but costly: How to tackle difficult trade-offs in evaluating health improving technologies in liver diseases.有效但昂贵:如何应对评估肝病改善健康技术中的困难权衡。
Hepatology. 2016 Oct;64(4):1331-42. doi: 10.1002/hep.28527. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
2
Budget impact analysis-principles of good practice: report of the ISPOR 2012 Budget Impact Analysis Good Practice II Task Force.预算影响分析——良好实践原则:ISPOR 2012 预算影响分析良好实践 II 工作组报告。
Value Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):5-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.2291. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
3
The role of decision analytic modeling in the health economic assessment of spinal intervention.决策分析模型在脊柱干预健康经济评估中的作用。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Oct 15;39(22 Suppl 1):S16-42. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000567.
4
Balancing costs and benefits at different stages of medical innovation: a systematic review of Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).平衡医学创新不同阶段的成本与效益:多标准决策分析(MCDA)的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 9;15:262. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0930-0.
5
[Decision modeling for economic evaluation of health technologies].[卫生技术经济评估的决策建模]
Cien Saude Colet. 2014 Oct;19(10):4209-22. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320141910.02402013.
6
Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis.预算影响分析良好实践原则:ISPOR良好研究实践特别工作组——预算影响分析报告
Value Health. 2007 Sep-Oct;10(5):336-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00187.x.
7
Approaches for economic evaluations of health care technologies.医疗保健技术的经济评估方法。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 May;6(5):307-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.01.011.
8
Universal coverage with rising healthcare costs; health outcomes research value in decision-making in Latin America.全民医保与不断上涨的医疗成本;卫生成果研究在拉丁美洲决策中的价值。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Dec;11(6):657-9. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.83.
9
Health economic assessment: a methodological primer.健康经济评估:方法学入门。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009 Dec;6(12):2950-66. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6122950. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
10
[Economic evaluation of healthcare technologies: an introduction for physicians].[医疗技术的经济评估:给医生的介绍]
Rev Neurol. 2011 Jul 16;53(2):107-15.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis: The missing factor in the management of HCC.成本效益分析:肝癌管理中缺失的因素。
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2024 Jun 7;23(1):e0178. doi: 10.1097/CLD.0000000000000178. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun.
2
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of siponimod in the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in Italy.西尼莫德治疗意大利多发性硬化症继发进展期的成本效果和预算影响分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 8;17(3):e0264123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264123. eCollection 2022.
3
Dissection of two drug-targeted regions of Hepatitis C virus subtype 4a infecting Egyptian patients.
对感染埃及患者的丙型肝炎病毒 4a 亚型两个药物靶向区域的剖析。
Virus Genes. 2020 Oct;56(5):564-581. doi: 10.1007/s11262-020-01776-y. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
4
Clinical outcome indicators in chronic hepatitis B and C: A primer for value-based medicine in hepatology.慢性乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎的临床转归指标:肝病学中基于价值的医学入门。
Liver Int. 2020 Jan;40(1):60-73. doi: 10.1111/liv.14285. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
5
Cost-effectiveness and budget effect of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV-1 prevention in Germany from 2018 to 2058.2018 年至 2058 年德国预防 HIV-1 感染的暴露前预防的成本效益和预算影响。
Euro Surveill. 2019 Feb;24(7). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.7.1800398.
6
Early treatment of acute hepatitis C infection is cost-effective in HIV-infected men-who-have-sex-with-men.早期治疗急性丙型肝炎感染在感染 HIV 的男男性行为者中具有成本效益。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0210179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210179. eCollection 2019.
7
Prioritising, Ranking and Resource Implementation - A Normative Analysis.优先排序、分级和资源实施——规范分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jun 1;7(6):532-541. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.125.