Kennedy R A, Sheps S B
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Can J Ophthalmol. 1989 Oct;24(6):259-64.
We screened 236 consecutive patients aged 6 years or less using an Off-Axis photoscreener and an Otago-type photoscreener. With a masked standardized clinical assessment as the standard, an overall comparison of the results obtained with the two techniques revealed a sensitivity and specificity in the neighbourhood of 0.85 and 0.87 respectively for the Off-Axis photoscreener and 0.94 and 0.94 respectively for the Otago photoscreener. Both techniques, but especially the Off-Axis technique, were less sensitive and specific in younger children (24 months or less). Fundus colour (light or dark) did not greatly affect sensitivity or specificity. Photoscreening with the pupil dilated led to an increase in false-positive results with both techniques. Our results showed the Otago photoscreener to be superior in this clinical trial.
我们使用离轴式验光仪和奥塔哥式验光仪对236名连续的6岁及以下儿童进行了筛查。以盲法标准化临床评估作为标准,对两种技术所获结果的总体比较显示,离轴式验光仪的敏感性和特异性分别约为0.85和0.87,奥塔哥验光仪的敏感性和特异性分别为0.94和0.94。两种技术,尤其是离轴式技术,在年龄较小的儿童(24个月及以下)中敏感性和特异性较低。眼底颜色(浅或深)对敏感性或特异性影响不大。两种技术散瞳后进行验光筛查均导致假阳性结果增加。我们的结果表明,在该临床试验中奥塔哥验光仪更具优势。